[QGIS-Developer] Explicit policy re bug fixing responsibilities after new features

Tim Sutton tim at kartoza.com
Wed Mar 11 07:02:22 PDT 2020


> On 11 Mar 2020, at 10:04, Saber Razmjooei <saber.razmjooei at lutraconsulting.co.uk> wrote:
> Most of this argument is also applicable to the documentation of new features. It is often left to documentation team or users to figure it out. Obviously, we are guilty of this!
> Overall, for a paid development, there should be a whole package to consider:
> - Development cost <<< that is the only cost mostly considered!
> - Maintenance
> - Documentation
> - PR review(s) (esp. for larger features it is worth costing in the reviews)
+ Changelog Entry




Tim Sutton

Co-founder: Kartoza
Ex Project chair: QGIS.org

Visit http://kartoza.com <http://kartoza.com/> to find out about open source:

Desktop GIS programming services
Geospatial web development
GIS Training
Consulting Services

Skype: timlinux 
IRC: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net

I'd love to connect. Here's my calendar link <https://calendly.com/timlinux> to make finding time easy.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20200311/dc9a1f4f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: KartozaNewLogoThumbnail.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6122 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20200311/dc9a1f4f/attachment-0001.jpg>

More information about the QGIS-Developer mailing list