[QGIS-Developer] Future of OTB provider plugin?

[Alexander Bruy]

Just to remind that most of the Processing developers were against its
inclusion in the core back in 2018 and predicted that it won't be
maintained and eventually will be removed.

Said that, a huge +1 from me.

нд, 12 лист. 2023 р. о 23:38 Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer
<qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org> пише:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I'd like to kick start some discussions about the future of the official OTB Processing Provider plugin which comes pre-installed with QGIS.
>
> As you may or may not be aware of, the Processing maintainers have been on a multi-year quest to slim down the core set of out-of-the-box providers. The biggest consequences of these have been the demotion of the Processing R Providers and SAGA providers to 3rd party, community maintained plugins.
>
> The main motivations behind this are:
>
> - Making sure that all the out of the box tools "just work" consistently across different platforms, without requiring users to install additional software.
> - Easing the maintenance burden on the core QGIS team -- by moving these plugins to community maintained repositories, we lower the barrier of entry for contributors to these plugins.
> - Avoiding issues with "tight coupling" of 3rd party tools to QGIS versions. This was especially the case with the SAGA provider, where it proved impossible to keep a stable plugin which worked consistently across the range of SAGA versions installable on different platforms. (The 3rd party SAGA NG plugin avoids this by ALWAYS targeting the most recent SAGA version, and leaving it as the user's responsibility for installing this version. We didn't have the same flexibility when the SAGA provider was a core part of QGIS).
>
> I'd like to now focus on the out-of-the-box OTB Processing provider, and personally I would like to see this one demoted to a community maintained plugin.
>
> My reasons are:
> 1. The provider has not seen development efforts outside of "keep this running only" by the usual QGIS committers. I would hope to see the same results as we saw with the R and SAGA plugins where moving to community maintained plugins increases the number of outside contributions.
> 2. OTB requires a separate installation outside of QGIS, and isn't easily available on many supported QGIS platforms (eg there's no Fedora package).
>  3. The OTB installer does some weird thing in the QGIS ci environment, which make me nervous:
>
> 2023-11-12T12:54:48.9064680Z #26 18.57 warning: working around a Linux kernel bug by creating a hole of 20480 bytes in ‘./lib/libQt5Core.so.5.10.1’
>
> So... what does everyone else think? Can we safely demote OTB to a 3rd party plugin and remove it for QGIS 3.36?
>
> Nyall
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



-- 
Alexander Bruy