[QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Push back feature freeze by 1/1.5 weeks?

Stefanos Natsis uclaros at gmail.com
Fri Jan 16 02:10:31 PST 2026


Aha, thanks for clarifying that!
I'd be +1 for extending the "release candidate" status to more patch
releases. We could reconsider its removal before each patch release of the
4.0. cycle, though, based on the current state at the time.

Stefanos

On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 at 09:55, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026, 5:46 pm Stefanos Natsis, <uclaros at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I thought since 3.20 all .0 versions are marked as "release candidate"
>>
>
> Yeah but this would be marking ALL 4.0.x releases as beta, not just 4.0.0
>
> Nyall
>
>
>> Stefanos
>>
>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 at 09:31, Régis Haubourg <regis.haubourg at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, my IT department updates  packages in our software portal whenever
>>> they ... want or users ask.
>>>
>>> Maybe we should explicitly name 4.0 "release candidate" in the package
>>> names and our communication if 4.0 is that broken.
>>> Regis
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 16 janvier 2026 01:49:16 GMT+01:00, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-PSC <
>>> qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> a écrit :
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 19:30, Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi all,
>>>> >
>>>> > Regarding testing/bugfixing.
>>>> >
>>>> > I hope and I assume that companies and organizations wouldn't have
>>>> the idea to base their mission critical work on a .0 release ... but rather
>>>> wait for the next LT version or a couple of patch releases until QGIS 4.x
>>>> can mature further.
>>>>
>>>> Definitely -- it's not going to be anywhere NEAR enterprise ready 🤣.
>>>> (I just ran into the known issue where the qt6 builds can corrupt your user
>>>> profiles... someone should probably look into that one sometime!)
>>>>
>>>> Nyall
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > Andreas
>>>> >
>>>> > On 2026-01-15 08:01, Stefanos Natsis via QGIS-PSC wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > I'm also +1, however I'm slightly worried that we should somehow
>>>> compensate for the reduced testing/bugfixing time of this feature-rich
>>>> release.
>>>> >
>>>> > Best
>>>> > Stefanos
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 08:37, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer <
>>>> qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 16:00, Andreas Neumann <andreas at qgis.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > +1 - to have a voice from PSC ;-)
>>>> >
>>>> > Perfect, thanks Andreas!
>>>> >
>>>> > Nyall
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Andreas
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 03:50, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer <
>>>> qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 at 01:23, Martin Dobias <wonder.sk at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > Hi all
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 10:21 PM Nyall Dawson via QGIS-PSC <
>>>> qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >> I'm wondering if we could possibly push back the feature freeze
>>>> date
>>>> > >> >> by 1-1.5 weeks for this cycle?
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > +1 from me.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> So do we consider this locked in now? Freeze moved to 27th Jan?
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Nyall
>>>> > >> _______________________________________________
>>>> > >> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>>>> > >> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> > >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>> > >> Unsubscribe:
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > Andreas Neumann
>>>> > > QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > QGIS-Developer mailing list
>>>> > QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > QGIS-PSC mailing list
>>>> > QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20260116/fcae8cf1/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the QGIS-Developer mailing list