[QGIS-Developer] SAGA GIS plugin maintenance

[Serkan Girgin]

Hi all,

It might be possible that some of you are aware of this, but regarding
funding of open-source geospatial software there is a HORIZON Coordination
and Support Actions call with a budget of 6M euro, which was closed
recently:
https://www.horizon-europe.gouv.fr/services-and-business-incubator-geospatial-open-source-developments-41508

The call states: "Proposals should foresee a range of 45-60% of the
proposed budget for providing financial support to third parties (FSTP),
with the aim of establishing seed funding mechanisms to aid identified
critical geospatial open-source projects".

I think this might be a nice opportunity not only for SAGA, but for many
others (including QGIS) that may use available funding quite effectively.
Might be good to follow the developments.

Best,

Serkan


On Thu, 21 May 2026 at 14:31, Alexander Bruy via QGIS-Developer <
qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Hi Stefano,
>
> I would be a -1 to the proposed idea. We need to be careful not to
> fuse the QGIS PSC and "the community". The PSC manages a project with
> lots of needs and pain points (infrastructure, bugfixing,
> documentation, packaging, just to name a few). I think that your
> proposal that the PSC should allocate funds to maintain a specific,
> third-party plugin sets a potentially problematic precedent. There are
> thousands of QGIS plugins and many of them are incredibly useful but
> not maintained anymore. What makes the SAGA plugin uniquely qualified
> to receive QGIS funding over any other unmaintained plugin? If
> QGIS.org starts funding the maintenance of external plugins from its
> budget, where do we draw the line?
>
> If the community truly feels this plugin is very valuable, the
> solution should come from the ground up, not from the top down. The
> users and organizations who rely heavily on SAGA should be the ones to
> find funds and find developer(s) willing to step up, take ownership
> and the maintenance burden.
>
> I haven't followed the development of the SAGA NextGen plugin closely,
> but from what I have seen, it was mainly only one person taking care
> of it and only a few very occasional contributors. This suggests that
> there is very low interest among users in actively supporting a tool
> which may be crucial for at least some of them.
>
> Also, as someone who was previously involved in the core SAGA plugin
> maintenance and developed an alternative SAGA Processing provider for
> my own needs, I can only confirm all previously raised points
> regarding the overhead related to keeping up with SAGA's changes.
> Command structures and names change frequently, things tend to break
> here and there without a notice, and the only source of truth is the
> source code. It is indeed a heavy burden and that's exactly why it was
> removed from QGIS core in the first place.
>
> Just to reiterate my main point: users who want to have a SAGA plugin
> should organize a dedicated fundraising campaign or find development
> volunteers themselves. That would be a fair and truly community-driven
> solution, rather than asking QGIS.org to stretch its budget for a
> third-party dependency.
>
> чт, 21 трав. 2026 р. о 10:53 Stefano Campus via QGIS-Developer
> <qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org> пише:
> >
> > Good morning everyone,
> >
> > I’m writing to the dev list because I think this issue is of interest.
> >
> > For the past few days, the SAGA Next plugin—which allows you to use SAGA
> GIS modules within QGIS Processing—has been unavailable.
> >
> > According to reports in the QGIS community’s Telegram group, maintaining
> this plugin is becoming increasingly difficult due to developments in the
> SAGA project, which can cause the plugin to stop working.
> >
> > I recall that until a couple of years ago, SAGA was, like GRASS, a
> resource installed directly within QGIS, but then, precisely because of the
> difficulty in keeping up with SAGA’s developments, it was decided to treat
> SAGA as a third-party resource accessible via plugins.
> >
> > I believe it is right that this important resource should not be
> maintained on a voluntary basis by a single developer/user, but that it
> should be taken on by the community.
> >
> > Do you think it would be a good idea to propose to the Steering Group
> that its maintenance be taken on directly by the QGIS.org Foundation and
> that a certain sum (1000–2000 euros?) be set aside in the annual budget for
> its maintenance?
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > stefano campus
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > QGIS-Developer mailing list
> > QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
> --
> Alexander Bruy
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20260521/7b1413b4/attachment-0001.htm>