[Qgis-psc] Infrastructure

[Nathan Woodrow]

I agree.  If we said lets move to GitHub issue tracker I would not complain.

Paolo, it might be good to put together a document on what stuff we use,
where it lives, and who maintains it.  Like a inventory of sorts.

- Nathan


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Otto Dassau <dassau at gbd-consult.de> wrote:

> Am Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:05:34 +0100
> schrieb Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Il 20/03/2013 07:56, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
> >
> > > Maybe I am loosing some of my idealism of youth but I have been
> > > increasingly following the principle of 'best tool for the job,
> > > preferring FOSS wherever possible'.....this is something of a
> > > degradation of my 'FOSS or death' outlook, but it proprietary tools are
> > > needed to help us make our project better then so be it.
> > >
> > > On the subject of the github tracker - we use it for InaSAFE and I must
> > > say it is 1000000 times better than redmine / trac anything else - its
> > > really simple to use - its a personal failing but I hardly ever look in
> > > redmine because I find it so slow and klunky to work with.
> >
> > Thanks Tim for being frank (Frank?). Yes, that's my perception, and by
> > raising this point I'm trying to make this an explicit choice, rather
> than
> > a creeping feeling. Setting aside idealism, I think we should consider
> > real threats and opportunities, and going the appropriate way: if risks
> > are very low in the long term, let's simplify and move on; if not, let's
> > consolidate an alternative approach. Opinions?
> > All the best.
> > - --
> > Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
>
> +1 from me to select the 'best tool for the job' with a strong preference
> for
> open source - if possible. In the case of github and redmine I would also
> prefere to consolidate and use github tracker, if it is 1 Mio times better.
>
> Regards
> Otto
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20130320/70d49267/attachment.html>