[Qgis-psc] Infrastructure

[Tim Sutton]

Hi

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com>wrote:

> I agree.  If we said lets move to GitHub issue tracker I would not
> complain.
>
> Paolo, it might be good to put together a document on what stuff we use,
> where it lives, and who maintains it.  Like a inventory of sorts.
>
> @Nathan we did a brain dump of this (I am sure it is not exhaustive) in
Essen. Andreas Neumann transcribed our brain dump to a mind map web tool
somewhere - if you dig through the dev list archives you will find it I
think. Would be nice to add a link to it in the provenance docs.

Regards

Tim



> - Nathan
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Otto Dassau <dassau at gbd-consult.de>wrote:
>
>> Am Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:05:34 +0100
>> schrieb Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>:
>>
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > Il 20/03/2013 07:56, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
>> >
>> > > Maybe I am loosing some of my idealism of youth but I have been
>> > > increasingly following the principle of 'best tool for the job,
>> > > preferring FOSS wherever possible'.....this is something of a
>> > > degradation of my 'FOSS or death' outlook, but it proprietary tools
>> are
>> > > needed to help us make our project better then so be it.
>> > >
>> > > On the subject of the github tracker - we use it for InaSAFE and I
>> must
>> > > say it is 1000000 times better than redmine / trac anything else - its
>> > > really simple to use - its a personal failing but I hardly ever look
>> in
>> > > redmine because I find it so slow and klunky to work with.
>> >
>> > Thanks Tim for being frank (Frank?). Yes, that's my perception, and by
>> > raising this point I'm trying to make this an explicit choice, rather
>> than
>> > a creeping feeling. Setting aside idealism, I think we should consider
>> > real threats and opportunities, and going the appropriate way: if risks
>> > are very low in the long term, let's simplify and move on; if not, let's
>> > consolidate an alternative approach. Opinions?
>> > All the best.
>> > - --
>> > Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
>>
>> +1 from me to select the 'best tool for the job' with a strong preference
>> for
>> open source - if possible. In the case of github and redmine I would also
>> prefere to consolidate and use github tracker, if it is 1 Mio times
>> better.
>>
>> Regards
>> Otto
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>


-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==============================================
Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming services
 * GeoDjango web development
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==============================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20130320/6d108a1d/attachment.html>