[Qgis-psc] Motion: Resurrecting the RFC (QEP - QGIS Enhancement Proposal)

[Marco Hugentobler]

Hi Tim

 >We accept the concept of formalised proposals for major changes to the 
QGIS project

+1

With the working group (2), at which point does the PSC have the 
possibility to give input and decide? Once the RFC/QEP proposal is finished?

Regards,
Marco

On 03.09.2014 12:52, Tim Sutton wrote:
> Hi PSC
>
> Just a meta-level observation here (based on watching the discussion 
> traffic over on the dev list) that  I think the most constructive way 
> forward with the RFC/QEP is to have one designated person running the 
> effort of curating / managing the proposals and then give them some 
> autonomy to form a team and self organise / make decisions etc. 
> Otherwise we will reach our typical 'which logo is the nicest' impasse 
> every time something needs to be decided. Thus can I put the following 
> proposals to the PSC:
>
> 1) We accept the concept of formalised proposals for major changes to 
> the QGIS project
>
> 2) We assign one person to head up this work, form a working group and 
> self-organise
>
> ---------------
>
> I am +1 on the concept of having QEP/RFC.
>
> I would like to nominate Nathan Woodrow to head up this process since 
> he seems to be the most passionate and invested in it.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc


-- 
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20140903/9d011602/attachment.html>