[Qgis-psc] outstanding issues
Anita Graser
anitagraser at gmx.at
Mon Nov 23 10:19:34 PST 2015
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:05 PM, ElPaso <elpaso at itopen.it> wrote:
> Il 23/11/2015 18:09, Anita Graser ha scritto:
>>
>> I think we also need to make a decision. Therefore, I'd like to suggest
>> to make a motion on Statement 2 and set everything in motion to get minimal
>> bug fixes ready for the next release.
>> Procedure-wise, I'm wondering who should vote on the motion: core devs?
>> PSC?
>>
> thanks for the summary.
> I just wonder if discussing on qgis-developer wouldn't be useful.
> I'm not sure about ho many developers follow this list, maybe other devs
> have something interesting to say.
For the long-term plan, I think this should definitely be discussed on the
dev list. For the next release, I'd rather start moving than spend much
more time discussing. Just my 2 cents.
Best wishes,
Anita
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20151123/5df2a500/attachment.html>
More information about the Qgis-psc
mailing list