[Qgis-psc] outstanding issues

[Nyall Dawson]

On 24 Nov 2015 6:52 AM, "Luigi Pirelli" <luipir at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 23 November 2015 at 18:09, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:
> > Procedure-wise, I'm wondering who should vote on the motion: core devs?
PSC?
>
> IMHO core+psc
>
> reasons:
> 1)everyone is responsible of the code
> 2)how to do public this responsibility is a political choice

Isn't this what QEPs are for? I think one should be created for wider
discussion of these issues. If we're lucky, the increased exposure to the
discussion may result in someone offering up sponsorship to resolve this
situation.

Nyall

>
> my 2c
>
> Luigi Pirelli
>
>
**************************************************************************************************
> * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com
> * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
> * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
> * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
> * Mastering QGIS:
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis
>
**************************************************************************************************
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20151124/dfacf23e/attachment.html>