[Qgis-psc] Proceeding with ballot for QGIS Community Voting members

[DelazJ]

Hi all,

I wonder if each voter should pick 12 people or* up to* 12 people. Having
to pick 12 people could lead some voters to choose people they would not
want to vote for, because they had less than 12 people in the list they
think they "deserve" this role.
Hoping that it doesn't complicate the process...

Then, could sound like a basic question, but: Can a voter pick himself in
the list?

Thanks for reviving this process,
Harrissou

2016-07-25 9:20 GMT+02:00 Neumann, Andreas <a.neumann at carto.net>:

> Hi Tim,
>
> Thanks for preparing it - I agree with Nyall and Martin that each voter
> should pick 12 people.
>
> This should only require second/third rounds if there are ties at the end
> of the list across the 12th/13th place on the list.
>
> Looking forward to have this group established.
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>
> On 2016-07-25 02:12, Martin Dobias wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On 25 July 2016 at 09:34, Tim Sutton <tim at qgis.org> wrote:
>
>
> Dear PSC
>
> As per our meeting earlier this month and our discussions at the hackfest
> in Gerona I would like to proceed with the ballot to choose the QGIS
> Community Voting members. I am also aware that the whole process is / was
> somewhat confusing for some people and that we are trying to bootstrap here
> which makes things even more complex. As such I propose to do the following
> to proceed:
>
> 1) Ask all GitHub committers (see below for a complete list) to vote for
> one of the nominees listed below
>
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to ask each committer to vote for up to 12
> nominees? That effectively is the usual process then, just
> fast-tracked to get through the backlog of 12 outstanding members.
>
> 23 people voting for 1 preferred nominee could lead to VERY different
> results then 23 people each voting for their preferred 12 nominees.
>
>
> I agree with Nyall this would make more sense and it should be faster
> to get the voting done.
>
> Cheers
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20160725/4febe5b5/attachment.html>