[Qgis-psc] Easier approval for experimental plugins?

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi Paolo,

hm - I am very sceptical about self approval. This would really open the 
door for all sorts of malware and security issues, if stuff isn't 
reviewed at all. After all, even with our disclaimer, the reputation of 
the project is at stake if we would have a plugin with malware. The 
review by Paolo is at least some sort of barrier against that.

Andreas



On 09.06.2016 17:36, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have just been suggested a possible improvement of our approval
> process: perhaps the experimental plugins could be distributed with less
> stringent criteria, e.g. allowing self approval, to allow quicker
> distribution of test version.
> What is your opinion about this?
> All the best.