[Qgis-psc] Statute modifications

[Neumann, Andreas]

Hi Jürgen, 

I would say no - leaving PSC members don't get automatically voting
member status. They can be nominated, when either a voting member
resigns, or when a new QGIS user group is added. Tim and I suggest that
we only add new voting members once a year - to reduce the bureaucracy. 

In general I would say that double mandates should be avoided. The
voting members should control the work of the PSC. I think there are a
few double mandates, such as Paolo and me - who are both a voting member
(user group representative) and also PSC/board members. It can be
discussed if this should be avoided. If yes, it should be clarified in
the statutes. 

Andreas 

On 2016-10-05 15:36, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 05. Oct 2016 at 12:07:04 +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote: For QGIS Voting Members I am proposing membership be perpetual (or until
> a motion is passed to have them removed).

> thanks for comments. I understand your point, and you may be right.
> All the best.

Do leaving PSC members also get a voting member status?   I think no PSC
member
was nominated as community voting member at the time.

Jürgen 
_______________________________________________
Qgis-psc mailing list
Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc 

  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20161005/65bbc62d/attachment.html>