[Qgis-psc] Selection of successful QGIS grant applications

[Tim Sutton]

Hi Larry


> On 20 Apr 2017, at 7:24 PM, Larry Shaffer <larrys at dakotacarto.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tim and PSC,
> 
> Is the a reason normal cumulative weighting of the votes was not used instead of the per-level exclusionary approach?
> 
> Attached are the tally results when done in a cumulative manner, which I think is a fairer representation of one's vote and reflection upon each project's overall importance, when compared to the current method. Note the very different results, though the top projects are still fairly similar.
> 

Thanks that makes much better sense - I have updated the spreadsheet summary tab accordingly. As you say the outcome for the top 5 items is the same (though their sequence changes) - I will follow your approach for future grant votes.

Regards

Tim


> Regards,
> 
> Larry Shaffer
> Dakota Cartography
> Black Hills, South Dakota
> 




---

Tim Sutton
QGIS Project Steering Committee Chair
tim at qgis.org




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20170420/c42eb43f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: qgis-icon-60x60.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4401 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20170420/c42eb43f/attachment.png>