[Qgis-psc] QGIS Server funding

[Régis Haubourg]

Hi again,

As discussed in july, we worked on fixing all issues regarding OGC
compliancy with WMS 1.3.0 in QGIS server 3.

Paul Blottiere did great and we reach now a *100% compliancy* on all
testing levels (basic, queryable,  elevation and recommended ) !

Here is the proof :) http://test.qgis.org/ogc_cite/latest_wms_1_3_0.html
<http://test.qgis.org/ogc_cite/latest_wms_1_3_0.html>

[image: Images intégrées 1]

Here is the PR log:

- Fix OGC test on legendurl styles :  #5044
<https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5044>
- Fixes OGC test on getmap:each-format mode for 1bit/8bit/16bit #5084
<https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5084>
- Fix OGC test getcapabilities:validate-using-schemaLocation #5145
<https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5145>
- Fix OGC test getfeatureinfo:invalid-info_format #5150
<https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5150>
- Fix OGC test getfeatureinfo:invalid-query_layers :  #5157
<https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5157>
- Fix OGC test getfeatureinfo:each-queryable-layer #5303
<https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5303>
- Fix OGC test getmap bbox #5360 <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5360>
- Fix OGC test recommendations #5566
<https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5566>


So, now we have a continuous integration in place, what would be nice to do
in the *future* is:

- *Integrate into QGIS travisCI our current gitlab pipeline* that produces
the OGC compliancy reports. The poor Travis probably has a lot of things on
his shoulders by now, but that would be very nice to run those tests on
each build concerning the server.

- *Start working on other services compliancy.* I bet we should start by
WFS and WCS.

- *Get certified by the OGC and make it clearly visible on our website and
documentation !*
See http://www.opengeospatial.org/compliance/getCertified
as part of the OSGEO, I suppose we probably are considered as OGC members
and we probably will need to pay annual fees of 80 $.
If we agree on that, I can contact the OGC to have a clearer idea of those
costs.
Anita, do you know what would be the status of QGIS project as a OGC member
through OGC membership?


Many thanks to all of the contributors! (again)

Best regards,

Régis Haubourg and the Oslandia team


2017-07-10 15:17 GMT+02:00 Régis Haubourg <regis.haubourg at gmail.com>:

> Hi all,
>
> After getting in sync with 3liz, here is a proposal of task :
>
> C2C:  1 K€ for making automatic reports with the performance benchmark
> platform
>
> 3Liz:   6 K€ for GetPrint refactor, and some new feature (WFS 1.1.0 and
> some caching improvements)
>
> OSLANDIA : 6 K€ for OGC unconformity checks and fixes
>
> Yves, can you please react upon, that if you have plans to work on png
> encoder improvements?
>
> Cheers
> Régis
>
>
> 2017-07-07 14:02 GMT+02:00 Yves Jacolin <yjacolin at free.fr>:
>
>> Good point, Emmanuel talked me about this. I need to discuss of this with
>> my
>> collegue first.
>>
>> Y.
>> On vendredi 7 juillet 2017 13:02:20 CEST Andreas Neumann wrote:
>> > Hi Yves,
>> >
>> > What about the idea to speed up PNG encoding? I remember that the C2C
>> devs
>> > found out, that the PNG encoder from qt isn't very efficient and a lot
>> of
>> > time is spent by QGIS server on this PNG encoding. An alternative PNG
>> > encoder could be more efficient. Could we invest some ressources in
>> that?
>> > It wouldn't be as urgent as the refactoring, but performance
>> improvements
>> > are always welcome.
>> > Or is the PNG encoder in qt5 now more efficient than the one in qt4?
>> >
>> > Andreas
>> >
>> > On 7 July 2017 at 10:58, Yves Jacolin <yjacolin at free.fr> wrote:
>> > > Hello Régis,
>> > >
>> > > On vendredi 7 juillet 2017 10:47:40 CEST Régis Haubourg wrote:
>> > > > @Yves, please raise the hand if you are willing to take some funds
>> on
>> > > > the
>> > > > speed benchmark platform, this would also be very welcome by dev's
>> and
>> > > > customers.
>> > >
>> > > I was wondering what Camptocamp can do for this as I had confirmation
>> that
>> > > we
>> > > have some resource to work on this part.
>> > >
>> > > About the speed benchmark plateform we can make it automatic (mainly
>> some
>> > > cleanup, create automatic reporting and improving QGIS automatic build
>> > > with
>> > > docker). For these task we won't need more than 1 k€ though.
>> > >
>> > > Finally we can also host this in one of our public server but the
>> deploy
>> > > of
>> > > the project should be easy if you need to test somewhere else.
>> > >
>> > > Y.
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20171116/f7bd14a4/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 40073 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20171116/f7bd14a4/attachment.png>