[Qgis-psc] QGIS Server funding

[Giovanni Manghi]

congrats! and many thanks for your work!

cheers

-- G --




On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Régis Haubourg <regis.haubourg at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi again,
>
> As discussed in july, we worked on fixing all issues regarding OGC
> compliancy with WMS 1.3.0 in QGIS server 3.
>
> Paul Blottiere did great and we reach now a *100% compliancy* on all
> testing levels (basic, queryable,  elevation and recommended ) !
>
> Here is the proof :) http://test.qgis.org/ogc_cite/latest_wms_1_3_0.html
> <http://test.qgis.org/ogc_cite/latest_wms_1_3_0.html>
>
> [image: Images intégrées 1]
>
> Here is the PR log:
>
> - Fix OGC test on legendurl styles :  #5044
> <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5044>
> - Fixes OGC test on getmap:each-format mode for 1bit/8bit/16bit #5084
> <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5084>
> - Fix OGC test getcapabilities:validate-using-schemaLocation #5145
> <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5145>
> - Fix OGC test getfeatureinfo:invalid-info_format #5150
> <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5150>
> - Fix OGC test getfeatureinfo:invalid-query_layers :  #5157
> <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5157>
> - Fix OGC test getfeatureinfo:each-queryable-layer #5303
> <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5303>
> - Fix OGC test getmap bbox #5360 <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5360>
> - Fix OGC test recommendations #5566
> <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5566>
>
>
> So, now we have a continuous integration in place, what would be nice to
> do in the *future* is:
>
> - *Integrate into QGIS travisCI our current gitlab pipeline* that
> produces the OGC compliancy reports. The poor Travis probably has a lot of
> things on his shoulders by now, but that would be very nice to run those
> tests on each build concerning the server.
>
> - *Start working on other services compliancy.* I bet we should start by
> WFS and WCS.
>
> - *Get certified by the OGC and make it clearly visible on our website
> and documentation !*
> See http://www.opengeospatial.org/compliance/getCertified
> as part of the OSGEO, I suppose we probably are considered as OGC members
> and we probably will need to pay annual fees of 80 $.
> If we agree on that, I can contact the OGC to have a clearer idea of those
> costs.
> Anita, do you know what would be the status of QGIS project as a OGC
> member through OGC membership?
>
>
> Many thanks to all of the contributors! (again)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Régis Haubourg and the Oslandia team
>
>
> 2017-07-10 15:17 GMT+02:00 Régis Haubourg <regis.haubourg at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After getting in sync with 3liz, here is a proposal of task :
>>
>> C2C:  1 K€ for making automatic reports with the performance benchmark
>> platform
>>
>> 3Liz:   6 K€ for GetPrint refactor, and some new feature (WFS 1.1.0 and
>> some caching improvements)
>>
>> OSLANDIA : 6 K€ for OGC unconformity checks and fixes
>>
>> Yves, can you please react upon, that if you have plans to work on png
>> encoder improvements?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Régis
>>
>>
>> 2017-07-07 14:02 GMT+02:00 Yves Jacolin <yjacolin at free.fr>:
>>
>>> Good point, Emmanuel talked me about this. I need to discuss of this
>>> with my
>>> collegue first.
>>>
>>> Y.
>>> On vendredi 7 juillet 2017 13:02:20 CEST Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>> > Hi Yves,
>>> >
>>> > What about the idea to speed up PNG encoding? I remember that the C2C
>>> devs
>>> > found out, that the PNG encoder from qt isn't very efficient and a lot
>>> of
>>> > time is spent by QGIS server on this PNG encoding. An alternative PNG
>>> > encoder could be more efficient. Could we invest some ressources in
>>> that?
>>> > It wouldn't be as urgent as the refactoring, but performance
>>> improvements
>>> > are always welcome.
>>> > Or is the PNG encoder in qt5 now more efficient than the one in qt4?
>>> >
>>> > Andreas
>>> >
>>> > On 7 July 2017 at 10:58, Yves Jacolin <yjacolin at free.fr> wrote:
>>> > > Hello Régis,
>>> > >
>>> > > On vendredi 7 juillet 2017 10:47:40 CEST Régis Haubourg wrote:
>>> > > > @Yves, please raise the hand if you are willing to take some funds
>>> on
>>> > > > the
>>> > > > speed benchmark platform, this would also be very welcome by dev's
>>> and
>>> > > > customers.
>>> > >
>>> > > I was wondering what Camptocamp can do for this as I had
>>> confirmation that
>>> > > we
>>> > > have some resource to work on this part.
>>> > >
>>> > > About the speed benchmark plateform we can make it automatic (mainly
>>> some
>>> > > cleanup, create automatic reporting and improving QGIS automatic
>>> build
>>> > > with
>>> > > docker). For these task we won't need more than 1 k€ though.
>>> > >
>>> > > Finally we can also host this in one of our public server but the
>>> deploy
>>> > > of
>>> > > the project should be easy if you need to test somewhere else.
>>> > >
>>> > > Y.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20171119/199c042d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 40073 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20171119/199c042d/attachment.png>