[Qgis-psc] QGIS Server funding

Sun Nov 19 12:56:42 PST 2017

Hi

From me too a huge thank you to everyone involved!

Regards

Tim

> On 19 Nov 2017, at 22:00, Giovanni Manghi <giovanni.manghi at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> congrats! and many thanks for your work!
> 
> cheers
> 
> -- G --
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Régis Haubourg <regis.haubourg at gmail.com <mailto:regis.haubourg at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi again, 
> 
> As discussed in july, we worked on fixing all issues regarding OGC compliancy with WMS 1.3.0 in QGIS server 3. 
> 
> Paul Blottiere did great and we reach now a 100% compliancy on all testing levels (basic, queryable,  elevation and recommended ) ! 
> 
> Here is the proof :) http://test.qgis.org/ogc_cite/latest_wms_1_3_0.html <http://test.qgis.org/ogc_cite/latest_wms_1_3_0.html>
> 
> <image.png>
> 
> Here is the PR log:
> 
> - Fix OGC test on legendurl styles :  #5044 <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5044>
> - Fixes OGC test on getmap:each-format mode for 1bit/8bit/16bit #5084 <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5084>
> - Fix OGC test getcapabilities:validate-using-schemaLocation #5145 <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5145>
> - Fix OGC test getfeatureinfo:invalid-info_format #5150 <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5150>
> - Fix OGC test getfeatureinfo:invalid-query_layers :  #5157 <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5157>
> - Fix OGC test getfeatureinfo:each-queryable-layer #5303 <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5303>
> - Fix OGC test getmap bbox #5360 <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5360>
> - Fix OGC test recommendations #5566 <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5566>
> 
> 
> So, now we have a continuous integration in place, what would be nice to do in the future is:
> 
> - Integrate into QGIS travisCI our current gitlab pipeline that produces the OGC compliancy reports. The poor Travis probably has a lot of things on his shoulders by now, but that would be very nice to run those tests on each build concerning the server. 
> 
> - Start working on other services compliancy. I bet we should start by WFS and WCS. 
> 
> - Get certified by the OGC and make it clearly visible on our website and documentation ! 
> See http://www.opengeospatial.org/compliance/getCertified <http://www.opengeospatial.org/compliance/getCertified>
> as part of the OSGEO, I suppose we probably are considered as OGC members and we probably will need to pay annual fees of 80 $. 
> If we agree on that, I can contact the OGC to have a clearer idea of those costs. 
> Anita, do you know what would be the status of QGIS project as a OGC member through OGC membership?
> 
> 
> Many thanks to all of the contributors! (again)
> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> Régis Haubourg and the Oslandia team
> 
> 
> 2017-07-10 15:17 GMT+02:00 Régis Haubourg <regis.haubourg at gmail.com <mailto:regis.haubourg at gmail.com>>:
> Hi all,  
> 
> After getting in sync with 3liz, here is a proposal of task :
> 
> C2C:  1 K€ for making automatic reports with the performance benchmark platform
> 
> 3Liz:   6 K€ for GetPrint refactor, and some new feature (WFS 1.1.0 and some caching improvements)
> 
> OSLANDIA : 6 K€ for OGC unconformity checks and fixes
> 
> Yves, can you please react upon, that if you have plans to work on png encoder improvements? 
> 
> Cheers
> Régis
>   
> 
> 2017-07-07 14:02 GMT+02:00 Yves Jacolin <yjacolin at free.fr <mailto:yjacolin at free.fr>>:
> Good point, Emmanuel talked me about this. I need to discuss of this with my
> collegue first.
> 
> Y.
> On vendredi 7 juillet 2017 13:02:20 CEST Andreas Neumann wrote:
> > Hi Yves,
> >
> > What about the idea to speed up PNG encoding? I remember that the C2C devs
> > found out, that the PNG encoder from qt isn't very efficient and a lot of
> > time is spent by QGIS server on this PNG encoding. An alternative PNG
> > encoder could be more efficient. Could we invest some ressources in that?
> > It wouldn't be as urgent as the refactoring, but performance improvements
> > are always welcome.
> > Or is the PNG encoder in qt5 now more efficient than the one in qt4?
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > On 7 July 2017 at 10:58, Yves Jacolin <yjacolin at free.fr <mailto:yjacolin at free.fr>> wrote:
> > > Hello Régis,
> > >
> > > On vendredi 7 juillet 2017 10:47:40 CEST Régis Haubourg wrote:
> > > > @Yves, please raise the hand if you are willing to take some funds on
> > > > the
> > > > speed benchmark platform, this would also be very welcome by dev's and
> > > > customers.
> > >
> > > I was wondering what Camptocamp can do for this as I had confirmation that
> > > we
> > > have some resource to work on this part.
> > >
> > > About the speed benchmark plateform we can make it automatic (mainly some
> > > cleanup, create automatic reporting and improving QGIS automatic build
> > > with
> > > docker). For these task we won't need more than 1 k€ though.
> > >
> > > Finally we can also host this in one of our public server but the deploy
> > > of
> > > the project should be easy if you need to test somewhere else.
> > >
> > > Y.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

---

Tim Sutton
QGIS Project Steering Committee Chair
tim at qgis.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20171119/34bd4603/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: qgis-icon-60x60.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4401 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20171119/34bd4603/attachment.png>