[Qgis-psc] PSC on Monday

Paolo Cavallini cavallini at faunalia.it
Mon Feb 5 11:01:29 PST 2018


Il 05/02/2018 17:47, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto:

> To reach a common ground, I propose the following:
> Keep all as plugin until all toolboxes will move towards a single
> generic provider that deals with descriptor files
> (QgsDescriptorFileProvider maybe)
> This way both QGIS and other toolbox team works closely and respect the
> rules of generic provider.
> And adding new providers will be a matter of "Does this toolbox provide
> a descriptor files for its applications?"
> For each provider, qgis maintain list of provider names and some
> settings (contributed and defined by toolbox's dev team)
> 
> Note: Idea of generic provider is not that bad and AFAIK works with otb
> and grass. Maybe saga too..

sounds good to me. I'd avoid rushing unless there are really good reasons.
Thanks.

-- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis



More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list