[Qgis-psc] [QGIS-Developer] Call for possible vote on change to official plugin repo policy?

Paolo Cavallini cavallini at faunalia.it
Wed Feb 21 02:30:14 PST 2018


Il 21/02/2018 10:59, Tim Sutton ha scritto:

>> On 21 Feb 2018, at 09:01, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it
>> <mailto:cavallini at faunalia.it>> wrote:
>>
>> as plugin manager, I'd appreciate this enormously; I wish there was a
>> clear policy, with no room for interpretation. Having >= 1 ticket marked
>> as critical could be one, but this just moves decisions one step ahead.
>> Do you have a practic proposal?
> 
> 
> Can you clarify here if the ticket should be in QGIS tracker or in
> plugin repo tracker?

I confirm, I meant in the bugtracker of each individual plugin.

> What is to stop them just chasing the ticket state
> and then asking for a release?

This is exactly what I meant with "move decisions one step ahead".
Sorry for being unclear.

In short, what we need is a clear criterion for deprecation, with as
little subjectivity as possible. I would welcome any suggestion on this.

All the best.
-- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180221/a5624400/attachment.sig>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list