[Qgis-psc] Performance tests QGIS Server

[Paul Blottiere]

Hi Andreas,


> @Paul: do you think we need a physical server or would a virtual one
> also work? What are the requirements you have?
>
> See https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/ for dedicated server
> and https://www.hetzner.de/cloud for virtual servers.
>
> Please let us know which one you would choose
>

Considering that performance tests have to be executed without any
interferences, I think that a dedicated server would be more suitable.

From what I saw on https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/, I think
that EX41S-SSD is good enough (64 GB RAM, Core i7, 2x240GB SSD).


Thanks!

Paul




On 09/07/18 08:48, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
> Yes - we can rent it any time on Hetzner, if you are ready.
>
> @Paul: do you think we need a physical server or would a virtual one
> also work? What are the requirements you have?
>
> See https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/ for dedicated server
> and https://www.hetzner.de/cloud for virtual servers.
>
> Please let us know which one you would chooses.
>
> @Richard: once Paul lets us know what he wants, could you two get in
> touch about setting it up and integrating it with the rest of our
> infrastructure at Hetzner?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Andreas
>
> On 2018-07-09 09:35, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>
>> Dear PSC,
>>
>>
>>
>>>     I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG would rent a dedicated server in our
>>>     Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG would pay for the server.
>>>
>>> Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
>>> further on this?
>>
>>
>> Doyou haveany news about the server?
>>
>>
>> Have a good day.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22/06/18 13:26, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>>> Hello PSC,
>>>
>>>
>>>     I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG would rent a dedicated server in our
>>>     Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG would pay for the server.
>>>
>>> Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
>>> further on this?
>>>
>>>
>>>     Also, the server rental is not really expensive for QGIS.ORG, but
>>>     finding a skilled sysadmin/dev to setup and maintain the system is
>>>     harder. Also, Richard and Jürgen do a lot of work on the QGIS.ORG
>>>     infrastructure - and I don't want to shovel even more work on their
>>>     shoulders
>>>
>>> I'm surely not as experienced as Richard or Jürgen, but I'm highly
>>> motivated to achieve this (if there's no objection of course).   
>>>
>>>
>>>     We can then discuss how much work this would mean for Oslandia and
>>>     what sponsoring level this would equate to.
>>>     we have discussed about trading work for sponsorship. IMHO this is a bit
>>>     of a grey area, as many of us already do unsexy, unpaid work.
>>>
>>> It's clearly a very sensitive question.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Yours is availabe now on:
>>>
>>>     http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>>>
>>> Nice, thanks Yves! By the way, how do we proceed to sort/present reports
>>> from MS-Perf and reports from QGIS-Server-PerfSuite? Because I think we 
>>> should explain "somewhere" differences between these platforms to avoid
>>> some confusion.
>>>  
>>>
>>> Otherwise, to continue in this direction, I'll send a mail to the dev
>>> mailing list in order to get some feedback and opinions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> On 22/06/18 12:31, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
>>>> Hi Yves (cc to PSC),
>>>>
>>>> Ok, thanks!
>>>> Yours is availabe now on:
>>>>
>>>> http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>>>>
>>>> Would be nice if there was a summary_latest.html pointing to the actual
>>>> latest test.
>>>>
>>>> See: http://tests.qgis.org/
>>>> and
>>>> http://tests.qgis.org/ogc_cite/
>>>> I will add test.qgis.org to the https://certificate next round.
>>>>
>>>> Although... tests.qgis.org was a temporary solution, do others think it
>>>> earns a subdomain? Or should we point qgis.org/tests to it?
>>>>
>>>> My ideas is that somebody takes the lead on
>>>> - writing a page in the QGIS-Website about the purpose of these two
>>>> tests (ogc_cite) and (perf_test), and then point to the 'latest' of
>>>> both, and to the index of both dirs if people want to see older results.
>>>>
>>>> Volunteers?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Richard Duivenvoorde
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22-06-18 10:59, Yves Jacolin wrote:
>>>>> Richard,
>>>>>
>>>>> Done, I pushed a result made two days ago. Cron job is weekly (every
>>>>> saturday). I will push some report on monday by hand but will push every
>>>>> sunday via a cron job.
>>>>>
>>>>> We can of course run test on another server (QGIS server).
>>>>>
>>>>> If you think we need to change anything, let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Y.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180709/9748e72f/attachment.html>