[Qgis-psc] Performance tests QGIS Server

[Andreas Neumann]

Sounds good.

Richard - could you please order the

EX41S-SSD
Line-Matrix
Intel® Core™ i7-6700 Quad-Core
CPU-B 10032
RAM: 64 GB DDR4
SSD: 2x 240 GB SATA 6 Gb/s SSD

on behalf of the project?

After ordering and setting it up, can you please inform how he can access
the server?

Thanks a lot to the two of you!

Andreas

On 9 July 2018 at 18:17, Paul Blottiere <paul.blottiere at oslandia.com> wrote:

> Hi Andreas,
>
>
> @Paul: do you think we need a physical server or would a virtual one also
> work? What are the requirements you have?
>
> See https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/ for dedicated server and
> https://www.hetzner.de/cloud for virtual servers.
>
> Please let us know which one you would choose
>
>
> Considering that performance tests have to be executed without any
> interferences, I think that a dedicated server would be more suitable.
>
> From what I saw on https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/, I think
> that EX41S-SSD is good enough (64 GB RAM, Core i7, 2x240GB SSD).
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> On 09/07/18 08:48, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
> Yes - we can rent it any time on Hetzner, if you are ready.
>
> @Paul: do you think we need a physical server or would a virtual one also
> work? What are the requirements you have?
>
> See https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/ for dedicated server and
> https://www.hetzner.de/cloud for virtual servers.
>
> Please let us know which one you would chooses.
>
> @Richard: once Paul lets us know what he wants, could you two get in touch
> about setting it up and integrating it with the rest of our infrastructure
> at Hetzner?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Andreas
>
> On 2018-07-09 09:35, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>
> Dear PSC,
>
>
>
> I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG would rent a dedicated server in our
> Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG would pay for the server.
>
> Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
> further on this?
>
>
> Do you have any news about the server?
>
>
> Have a good day.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> On 22/06/18 13:26, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>
> Hello PSC,
>
>
>
> I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG would rent a dedicated server in our
> Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG would pay for the server.
>
> Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
> further on this?
>
>
>
> Also, the server rental is not really expensive for QGIS.ORG, but
> finding a skilled sysadmin/dev to setup and maintain the system is
> harder. Also, Richard and Jürgen do a lot of work on the QGIS.ORG
> infrastructure - and I don't want to shovel even more work on their
> shoulders
>
> I'm surely not as experienced as Richard or Jürgen, but I'm highly
> motivated to achieve this (if there's no objection of course).
>
>
>
> We can then discuss how much work this would mean for Oslandia and
> what sponsoring level this would equate to.
> we have discussed about trading work for sponsorship. IMHO this is a bit
> of a grey area, as many of us already do unsexy, unpaid work.
>
> It's clearly a very sensitive question.
>
>
>
> Yours is availabe now on:
> http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>
> Nice, thanks Yves! By the way, how do we proceed to sort/present reports
> from MS-Perf and reports from QGIS-Server-PerfSuite? Because I think we
> should explain "somewhere" differences between these platforms to avoid
> some confusion.
>
>
> Otherwise, to continue in this direction, I'll send a mail to the dev
> mailing list in order to get some feedback and opinions.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 22/06/18 12:31, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
>
> Hi Yves (cc to PSC),
>
> Ok, thanks!
> Yours is availabe now on:
> http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>
> Would be nice if there was a summary_latest.html pointing to the actual
> latest test.
>
> See: http://tests.qgis.org/
> andhttp://tests.qgis.org/ogc_cite/
> I will add test.qgis.org to the https://certificate next round.
>
> Although... tests.qgis.org was a temporary solution, do others think it
> earns a subdomain? Or should we point qgis.org/tests to it?
>
> My ideas is that somebody takes the lead on
> - writing a page in the QGIS-Website about the purpose of these two
> tests (ogc_cite) and (perf_test), and then point to the 'latest' of
> both, and to the index of both dirs if people want to see older results.
>
> Volunteers?
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard Duivenvoorde
>
>
> On 22-06-18 10:59, Yves Jacolin wrote:
>
> Richard,
>
> Done, I pushed a result made two days ago. Cron job is weekly (every
> saturday). I will push some report on monday by hand but will push every
> sunday via a cron job.
>
> We can of course run test on another server (QGIS server).
>
> If you think we need to change anything, let me know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Y.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing listQgis-psc at lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing listQgis-psc at lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>



-- 

--
Andreas Neumann
QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180709/76021db5/attachment.html>