[Qgis-psc] GH move

[Anita Graser]

+1 to everyone saying that there is no need to move from GitHub because of
MS.

Anita



On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:55 AM Alexander Bruy <alexander.bruy at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Fully agree with Nyall and others. There is no need to move from GitHub
> just because of these news.
>
> 2018-06-05 3:26 GMT+03:00 Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com>:
> > On 5 June 2018 at 10:19, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it> wrote:
> >> Hi all.
> >> Just read about ms buying GH. Maybe we should react reasonably fast?
> >> I'd be in favour of migrating to gitlab, preferably on our server.
> >> Opinions?
> >> Cheers.
> >
> > Why? Honestly, what's changed from the QGIS project's perspective?
> >
> > MS have been reasonably open-source friendly over recent years, and in
> > any case GitHub was always a proprietary platform run by a commercial
> > entity (vs gitlab, a *mostly-open* platform run by a commercial
> > entity). I personally can't see why there's been any big reaction at
> > all to this buy out, or why we would need to move fast on anything.
> >
> > Nyall
> >
> >
> >> --
> >> Sorry for being short
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Qgis-psc mailing list
> >> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
> --
> Alexander Bruy
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180605/437b9c2d/attachment.html>