[Qgis-psc] Performance tests QGIS Server

[Paul Blottiere]

Hello PSC,


> I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG would rent a dedicated server in our
> Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG would pay for the server.

Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
further on this?


> Also, the server rental is not really expensive for QGIS.ORG, but
> finding a skilled sysadmin/dev to setup and maintain the system is
> harder. Also, Richard and Jürgen do a lot of work on the QGIS.ORG
> infrastructure - and I don't want to shovel even more work on their
> shoulders

I'm surely not as experienced as Richard or Jürgen, but I'm highly
motivated to achieve this (if there's no objection of course).   


> We can then discuss how much work this would mean for Oslandia and
> what sponsoring level this would equate to.
> we have discussed about trading work for sponsorship. IMHO this is a bit
> of a grey area, as many of us already do unsexy, unpaid work.

It's clearly a very sensitive question.


> Yours is availabe now on:
>
> http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html

Nice, thanks Yves! By the way, how do we proceed to sort/present reports
from MS-Perf and reports from QGIS-Server-PerfSuite? Because I think we 
should explain "somewhere" differences between these platforms to avoid
some confusion.
 

Otherwise, to continue in this direction, I'll send a mail to the dev
mailing list in order to get some feedback and opinions.



Regards,

Paul




 


On 22/06/18 12:31, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
> Hi Yves (cc to PSC),
>
> Ok, thanks!
> Yours is availabe now on:
>
> http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>
> Would be nice if there was a summary_latest.html pointing to the actual
> latest test.
>
> See: http://tests.qgis.org/
> and
> http://tests.qgis.org/ogc_cite/
> I will add test.qgis.org to the https://certificate next round.
>
> Although... tests.qgis.org was a temporary solution, do others think it
> earns a subdomain? Or should we point qgis.org/tests to it?
>
> My ideas is that somebody takes the lead on
> - writing a page in the QGIS-Website about the purpose of these two
> tests (ogc_cite) and (perf_test), and then point to the 'latest' of
> both, and to the index of both dirs if people want to see older results.
>
> Volunteers?
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard Duivenvoorde
>
>
> On 22-06-18 10:59, Yves Jacolin wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>> Done, I pushed a result made two days ago. Cron job is weekly (every
>> saturday). I will push some report on monday by hand but will push every
>> sunday via a cron job.
>>
>> We can of course run test on another server (QGIS server).
>>
>> If you think we need to change anything, let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Y.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180622/42a8e6ed/attachment.html>