[Qgis-psc] Notes about certification

[Nathan Woodrow]

>
> * the training material for each course should be released with a free
> license, and a review will be done; if the material is not of adequate
> quality, this is a cause for refusal


I'm also not in favor of this really.  I think a review process is ok but
forcing people to release their training material isn't really a nice thing
to do IMO.

- Nathan

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:40 PM Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> here the notes about the improved procedure for accepting training
> certifying organizations.
>
> If anything unclear, please integrate or let me know.
>
> Cheers.
>
> ===
>
> We elaborated a clear and open procedure for accepting certified
> entities, with the main aim of driving people to actively support the
> project:
>
> * in the application process the proponent should explain what are his
> contribution to QGIS project
>
> * following an initial review, the application will be sent to local
> QGIS groups for their opinon, which should take place in less than one
> monthly; where there is no user group, the responsibility will fall
> entirely on PSC shoulders
>
> * the training material for each course should be released with a free
> license, and a review will be done; if the material is not of adequate
> quality, this is a cause for refusal
>
> * then PSC will take a decision and publish the contributions as stated
> by the proponent, for transparency.
>
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
> https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180911/8605e4b4/attachment.html>