[Qgis-psc] QGIS Server and QWC2

[pblottiere]

Dear PSC,


QWC2 examples are now available on qgis4 server:
http://qgis4.qgis.org:8081/demos_qwc2/.


Moreover, I did a PR to document qgis4 deployment (certification suite,
performance tests, qwc2 and so on):
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Sysadmin/pull/12


>
> Perhaps a landing page saying "watch the current QGIS service"
> pointing to either sample webgis, performance
> tests, certification results according to time of day would do, and it
> would raise interest with other (I believe rather obscure for now)
> services, and promote qgis server reliability image in general.

+1.

I'm working on a dashboard to indicate services availability, but it's
not operational yet.


Otherwise, what do you think about moving QGIS-Server-PerfSuite [0] and
QGIS-Server-CertifSuite [1] to https://github.com/qgis? Considering that
it's dedicated to QGIS-Server and running on qgis4, we (Oslandia) think
it would make sens.


Regards,

Paul


[0] https://github.com/Oslandia/QGIS-Server-PerfSuite

[1] https://github.com/Oslandia/QGIS-Server-CertifSuite



On 3/26/19 10:18 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 26/03/19 09:33, pblottiere wrote:
>> Hi Paolo and Jürgen,
>>
>>
>>> In case we decide, I think it would be fair to open the same to other
>>> clients (only those specific to qgis server IMHO).
>> +1
>>
>>
>>> wouldn't this impact the reliability of performance
>>> measurements?
>>> How does that interfere with the performance tests?
>> Actually, I had the same problematic with online instances of QGIS
>> Server for certification process. Performance tests take about 3 hours
>> per day (for now but it may grow if we add more tests), so these online
>> instances are deactivated just before performance tests and reactivated
>> just after.
>>
>>
>> So, I was thinking about doing the same thing for QGIS Server clients (I
>> could add a message to indicate available time slots on a main page). I
>> realize that it's not an ideal situation, but an uptime of 87.5% is
>> better than nothing at all :). The perfect solution would be to deploy
>> these clients on another server, but I'm not sure it's really necessary
>> for now. Moreover, I have sudo rights on qgis4.qgis.org server, so I can
>> work on it without bothering anyone :).
>>
>>
>> What do you think?
> yes, it makes sense to me. Perhaps a landing page saying "watch the
> current QGIS service" pointing to either sample webgis, performance
> tests, certification results according to time of day would do, and it
> would raise interest with other (I believe rather obscure for now)
> services, and promote qgis server reliability image in general.
> All thee best, and thanks again.
>