[Qgis-psc] QGIS Server and QWC2

[pblottiere]

Dear PSC,


I come back to you about my previous question : "what do you think about
moving
QGIS-Server-PerfSuite [0] and QGIS-Server-CertifSuite [1] to
https://github.com/qgis? Considering that it's dedicated to QGIS-Server and
running on qgis4, we (Oslandia) think it would make sens."


But I could ask on the developer mailing list if you prefer.


Regards,

Paul


[0] https://github.com/Oslandia/QGIS-Server-PerfSuite

[1] https://github.com/Oslandia/QGIS-Server-CertifSuite



On 4/16/19 11:18 AM, pblottiere wrote:
> Dear PSC,
>
>
> QWC2 examples are now available on qgis4 server:
> http://qgis4.qgis.org:8081/demos_qwc2/.
>
>
> Moreover, I did a PR to document qgis4 deployment (certification suite,
> performance tests, qwc2 and so on):
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Sysadmin/pull/12
>
>
>> Perhaps a landing page saying "watch the current QGIS service"
>> pointing to either sample webgis, performance
>> tests, certification results according to time of day would do, and it
>> would raise interest with other (I believe rather obscure for now)
>> services, and promote qgis server reliability image in general.
> +1.
>
> I'm working on a dashboard to indicate services availability, but it's
> not operational yet.
>
>
> Otherwise, what do you think about moving QGIS-Server-PerfSuite [0] and
> QGIS-Server-CertifSuite [1] to https://github.com/qgis? Considering that
> it's dedicated to QGIS-Server and running on qgis4, we (Oslandia) think
> it would make sens.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul
>
>
> [0] https://github.com/Oslandia/QGIS-Server-PerfSuite
>
> [1] https://github.com/Oslandia/QGIS-Server-CertifSuite
>
>
>
> On 3/26/19 10:18 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> On 26/03/19 09:33, pblottiere wrote:
>>> Hi Paolo and Jürgen,
>>>
>>>
>>>> In case we decide, I think it would be fair to open the same to other
>>>> clients (only those specific to qgis server IMHO).
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>>> wouldn't this impact the reliability of performance
>>>> measurements?
>>>> How does that interfere with the performance tests?
>>> Actually, I had the same problematic with online instances of QGIS
>>> Server for certification process. Performance tests take about 3 hours
>>> per day (for now but it may grow if we add more tests), so these online
>>> instances are deactivated just before performance tests and reactivated
>>> just after.
>>>
>>>
>>> So, I was thinking about doing the same thing for QGIS Server clients (I
>>> could add a message to indicate available time slots on a main page). I
>>> realize that it's not an ideal situation, but an uptime of 87.5% is
>>> better than nothing at all :). The perfect solution would be to deploy
>>> these clients on another server, but I'm not sure it's really necessary
>>> for now. Moreover, I have sudo rights on qgis4.qgis.org server, so I can
>>> work on it without bothering anyone :).
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>> yes, it makes sense to me. Perhaps a landing page saying "watch the
>> current QGIS service" pointing to either sample webgis, performance
>> tests, certification results according to time of day would do, and it
>> would raise interest with other (I believe rather obscure for now)
>> services, and promote qgis server reliability image in general.
>> All thee best, and thanks again.
>>