[Qgis-psc] Questions on website

[Marco Bernasocchi]

Hi all,

Well I see your point, most enhancement requests were done in 2013 and
were never implemented, as said, I just closed and mentioned to reopen
if still relevant.  obviously feel free to reopen whatever you feel
should be open.

I've reopened the feature requests (even-though I don't really agree :)
), and mark them as low-priority. I rechecked all the other issues I had
closed and it still looks to me they should be closed.

Cheers

Marco


On 18.10.19 08:39, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Hi all,
> I agree with Andreas: amonge these there are velid suggestions, and real
> problems. The fact that we were unable to solve or implement them does
> not mean they are not valid. I suggest reverting it.
> Cheers.
>
> On 18/10/19 08:24, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>> Hi Marco,
>>
>> That's pretty aggressive - from the ones you closed I believe many are
>> still relevant. If I opened such a request and someone else closed that
>> without the issue being solved and the issue is still relevant, I'd be
>> not so amused.
>>
>> But we'll see how they react. Some issues are also definitely not
>> relevant anymore.
>>
>> Thanks anyway,
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> On 2019-10-17 19:17, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>
>>> I took a look at half the issues and took a rather radical approach of
>>> closing all very old issues/enhancements request (<2016) and prompting
>>> for reopen if wished.  If nobody cared for them in 5-6 years they are
>>> probably not needed.
>>>
>>> when I'll have more time I'll check the rest.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Marco
>>>
>>> On 17.10.19 17:44, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>> thanks for pointing this out
>>>>
>>>> On 17/10/19 16:23, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sometimes I have questions on the website that Richard probably could
>>>>> answer me - but since he is not on PSC anymore I don't want to bother
>>>>> him always with some questions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Who else can I ask on the PSC regarding technical questions on the
>>>>> website?
>>>>>
>>>>> In this specific case I wonder what to do with this PR:
>>>>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/pull/685
>>>>>
>>>>> Also - there are lots of issues on the Website
>>>>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/issues where to me it seems no-one
>>>>> really feels responsible for.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do believe that we should have one or better two people who feel
>>>>> responsible for the website, including maintenance of the Github repo,
>>>>> issues and PR of the website.
>>>>>
>>>>> The current situation is far from ideal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>> the only options I see are putting out a call for volunteers, or hiring
>>>> someone.
>>>> Cheers.

-- 
Marco Bernasocchi

QGIS.org Co-chair
http://berna.io