[Qgis-psc] On using Nextcloud for editing documents

Matthias Kuhn matthias at opengis.ch
Mon Apr 13 22:53:20 PDT 2020


Hi Marco,

Did you try collabora or onlyoffice? The first one is completely 
processed on the server and therefore very prone to lagging while the 
second one is a client (browser) implementation.

Matthias

On 4/13/20 8:54 PM, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
> hi Matthias, thanks for clarifing.
>  I forgot to mention that since the experience I just had on the OSGeo 
> NC were unfortunately very similar to what we had back then :(
>
> cheers Marco
>
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, 18:31 Matthias Kuhn, <matthias at opengis.ch 
> <mailto:matthias at opengis.ch>> wrote:
>
>     Hi
>
>     On 4/13/20 5:25 PM, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
>     > Ha Andreas
>     >
>     > On 12.04.20 10:39, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>     >> Hi,
>     >>
>     >> I tested editing the "environmental policy" draft on Nextcloud in
>     >> order to get a better feeling about the usability. I think
>     >> functionality wise it would probably ok for our needs, but the
>     lagging
>     >> is really, really disturbing and I agree with Tim that hurts
>     >> productivity substantially.
>     > We have a professionally hosted Nextcloud instance in
>     Switzerland, when
>     > we tested the collaborative in realtime with multiple people editing
>     > together, we continuously hit issues like the one you mention and
>     > decided not to use it as it was more frustrating than anything else.
>     >
>     > We now ose nextclout for storing our file and have them syncronised
>     > across the company (which works okisch) and use google docs for
>     working
>     > together on larger documents.
>
>     I have to add that these tests were performed more than a year ago
>     and I
>     have repeatedly heard that nextcloud has undertaken a lot on the
>     collaborative editing front.
>
>     Don't take this as a statement that it _is_ better now, but that the
>     findings Marco is referring to here _might_ reflect a state which
>     is no
>     longer accurate.
>
>     Matthias
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200414/b6419f20/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list