[Qgis-psc] AGM Voting matters arising

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi,

I prefer to leave the current version. At one point we need clear 
conditions, otherwise there will be endless discussions when a train 
ride instead of a flight is reasonable or not. If we skip that section 
altogether, then I'd rather have no text at all. It would be so vague, 
that it doesn't really help, in my opinion.

The list of carbon offset companies is not exclusive - I hope that this 
is clear, and if other carbon offset companies are used, that's fine - 
no need to revise the text. I heard rumors that certain airlines will 
have a carbon-offset fee included in the airfare. If a future plane 
ticket shows an extra item for a CO2 compensation, then I don't think 
that there is a need for extra CO2 compensation.

I don't expect frequent adaptions are required to the current version. 
What would have to change so often?

Thanks,

Andreas

Am 27.04.20 um 11:41 schrieb Paolo Cavallini:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Il 27/04/20 11:22, Andreas Neumann ha scritto:
>> Hi,
>>
>> About environmental policy:
>>
>> the current version is at
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CQ57w8jz_3MMW7ruIzaB30u4qUODHnoPTC9I7lSIuls/edit
>>
>>
>> There is one open comment by Vincent. Do you have any remarks on this
>> comment? If not, then I can generate a PDF version and we can link this
>> in the voting form - and if accepted - then create the website from the
>> text.
> I tend to agree with Vincent, but it's more of a practical issue than a
> blocker, so I happily leave the decision to you.
> Cheers.
>