[Qgis-psc] Grants 2020 preparation for voting

Alessandro Pasotti apasotti at gmail.com
Mon Jul 6 06:58:37 PDT 2020


+1 to spend all available grant funds.

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 12:54 AM Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Anita,
>
> If I recall correctly, when we've hit the situation in the past that
> there was a lower-voted project that fit within the remaining budget
> then we've previously "skipped" over the higher budget, higher voted
> proposal to also fund the lower budget proposals lower in the list
> until all the reserved funds are exhausted. Is this also going to
> happen this time? Basically it would affect whether or not part of the
> remaining 5.6k budget would be allocated to the 3k "QEP#177 MacOS
> Package Improvements" proposal.
>
> Nyall
>
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 00:57, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:
> >
> > The voting period is now over. I've closed the form and counted the votes. You find the preliminary results at:
> >
> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10MAeENptW-gi8spkmR_jn0Y-_9iYakR7wtV5XdSZZ1o/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > As it stands now, the 8 top-ranked proposals can be funded within the 40k grant budget.
> >
> > Could I ask you to please cross-check the results before we announce them.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Anita
> >
> >
> > Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Juni 2020 um 16:18 Uhr
> > Von: "Anita Graser" <anitagraser at gmx.at>
> >
> > The call for voting has been sent out now. The deadline is on Sunday, July 5th 2020.
> >
> > Please get in touch if you are a voting member and haven't received the invitation.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Anita
> >
> >
> >
> > On 19.06.2020 18:01, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
> >
> > Thanks a lot Denis and  Anita for the great work!
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Marco
> >
> > On 19.06.20 16:34, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I agree - thanks a lot for your work, Denis!
> >
> > It helps to get a good summary and present it a bit better.
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > On 2020-06-19 16:24, Anita Graser wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Denis!
> >
> > I think this is an excellent overview of the proposals.
> >
> > My goal is to send the call for voting out tomorrow evening if there are no arguments against it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Anita
> >
> >
> >
> > On 19.06.2020 13:48, Denis Rouzaud wrote:
> >
> > Hi Anita,
> >
> > Here is a first draft of a one page summary of the grants to be voted on.
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aiolvIpEGhBZ-iLhZl7cbUP1gPQx1-W83ecijpzNi4o/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > It's quite tricky to report the discussion without looking too negative. I hope this is neutral enough. I am totally open to suggestions, obviously.
> >
> > Let me know what you think,
> > Denis
> >
> > Le lun. 15 juin 2020 à 19:50, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> a écrit :
> >
> > Thank you Denis!
> >
> > We need the summaries as soon as possible. According to our timeline, we wanted to publish the voting results at the end of June (after a two week voting period):
> >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CNmSJxztrHrqLfillDH8v1zWaMzxFUyYSPT3sut55eQ/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > If you can manage to write the summaries by Sunday 21st, we can start the voting and have the results ready around July 6th.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Anita
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 19:14 Denis Rouzaud, <denis.rouzaud at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can give a hand for this. I can compile the summaries and comments.
> > When is it due?
> >
> > Denis
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 19:04 Anita Graser, <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do we have any volunteer for compiling the proposal and discussion
> > summaries?
> >
> > If nobody is available to take care of this step - we have to decide if
> > we feel comfortable to go ahead with the voting without the summaries.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Anita
> >
> >
> > On 13.06.2020 21:06, Anita Graser wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Since the QEP discussion period is over now, we need to take the next
> > > steps:
> > >
> > > According to our new process (discussed in
> > > https://github.com/qgis/PSC/issues/31), proposal and discussion
> > > summaries should be prepared that can be sent out to voters.
> > >
> > > @Paolo are you still available to take care of this?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Anita
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >
> > --
> > Marco Bernasocchi
> >
> > QGIS.org Chair
> > http://berna.io
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc



-- 
Alessandro Pasotti
QCooperative:  www.qcooperative.net
ItOpen:   www.itopen.it


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list