[Qgis-psc] [QGIS-Developer] Grant proposal review results

[Marco Bernasocchi]

Hi Denis,

On 04.06.20 09:22, Denis Rouzaud wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Many thanks for handling this.
> I have remove the labels from the concerned issues on the QEP repo.
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AGrant-2020
Thanks
>
> I checked the list and it seems that 2 grants from René-Luc were not
> in the evaluated list:
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/188
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/187
>
Those two proposals were not submitted in the grant proposal form so we
did not discuss those. 
There was not much discussion in the QEP either, so maybe René-luc is
planing to submit those in the next grant round?

> I am not sure how you want to handle this, so I'll let you decide
> before doing anything to the labeld.
Since they were not submitted you can remove the label. If something
went wrong in the submission form René-Luc please get in touch.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Denis
>
> Le mer. 3 juin 2020 à 22:15, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at
> <mailto:anitagraser at gmx.at>> a écrit :
>
>     Dear devs and fellow PSC members,
>
>     As part of yesterday's PSC meeting, we reviewed the grant
>     proposals with
>     regards to this year's formal grant programme criteria. You can
>     find the
>     results of this review in a new tab within the proposal
>     spreadsheet at:
>
>     https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DICkD-aE7VlPPCrA44NlsHOkwfGO19UrGYHRKB_A648/edit?usp=sharing
>
>     12 out of 17 proposals meet the grant programme requirements and are
>     therefore eligible for funding. Out of these 12, there are two
>     documentation proposals that the PSC has decided to fund directly
>     through the (separate) documentation budget. The remaining 10
>     proposals
>     result in a total requested budget of EUR 45,400.
>
>     I'd like to stress that this eligibility check is by no means a
>     judgement of the quality of an idea. Therefore, I'd like to strongly
>     encourage to follow up on the related QEPs even if a proposal
>     cannot be
>     funded by this year's grant programme.
>
>     The QEP discussion deadline for eligible proposals is Tuesday, June 9.
>     Afterwards we will move forward to the voting.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Anita
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-- 
Marco Bernasocchi
OPENGIS.ch CEO
QGIS.org Chair
marco at opengis.ch <mailto:marco at opengis.ch>
+41 (0)79 467 24 70 <tel:+41794672470>

OPENGIS.ch Logo <https://www.opengis.ch>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200604/974c9d84/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6671 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200604/974c9d84/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200604/974c9d84/attachment-0001.sig>