[Qgis-psc] Grants 2020 preparation for voting

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi, 

I agree - thanks a lot for your work, Denis! 

It helps to get a good summary and present it a bit better. 

Andreas 

On 2020-06-19 16:24, Anita Graser wrote:

> Thank you Denis! 
> 
> I think this is an excellent overview of the proposals. 
> 
> My goal is to send the call for voting out tomorrow evening if there are no arguments against it. 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Anita 
> 
> On 19.06.2020 13:48, Denis Rouzaud wrote: 
> Hi Anita, 
> 
> Here is a first draft of a one page summary of the grants to be voted on. 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aiolvIpEGhBZ-iLhZl7cbUP1gPQx1-W83ecijpzNi4o/edit?usp=sharing 
> 
> It's quite tricky to report the discussion without looking too negative. I hope this is neutral enough. I am totally open to suggestions, obviously. 
> 
> Let me know what you think, 
> Denis 
> 
> Le lun. 15 juin 2020 à 19:50, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> a écrit : 
> 
> Thank you Denis! 
> 
> We need the summaries as soon as possible. According to our timeline, we wanted to publish the voting results at the end of June (after a two week voting period): 
> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CNmSJxztrHrqLfillDH8v1zWaMzxFUyYSPT3sut55eQ/edit?usp=sharing 
> 
> If you can manage to write the summaries by Sunday 21st, we can start the voting and have the results ready around July 6th. 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Anita 
> 
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 19:14 Denis Rouzaud, <denis.rouzaud at gmail.com> wrote: 
> Hi,  
> 
> I can give a hand for this. I can compile the summaries and comments. 
> When is it due? 
> 
> Denis 
> 
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 19:04 Anita Graser, <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote: Hi,
> 
> Do we have any volunteer for compiling the proposal and discussion
> summaries?
> 
> If nobody is available to take care of this step - we have to decide if
> we feel comfortable to go ahead with the voting without the summaries.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anita
> 
> On 13.06.2020 21:06, Anita Graser wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Since the QEP discussion period is over now, we need to take the next
>> steps:
>> 
>> According to our new process (discussed in
>> https://github.com/qgis/PSC/issues/31), proposal and discussion
>> summaries should be prepared that can be sent out to voters.
>> 
>> @Paolo are you still available to take care of this?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Anita
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

_______________________________________________
Qgis-psc mailing list
Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200619/0f2894ff/attachment.html>