[Qgis-psc] Grants 2020 preparation for voting

[Tim Sutton]

Nice summary Denis, that makes it really easy to digest.

Anita are you going to provide some background about acceptance criteria or back story with the message you send out - especially we should clarify why the settings registry and table manager items are in the list if the remit is not to fund new features. That last sentence sounds negative but isn’t intended that way - I am actually glad to have those features funded if they are, just that we should be clear about the rules. The selective masking note about discussion might benefit from a link to the discussion so others can understand what is going on.

Lastly, Evan’s proposal has a word ‘deocing’ - I can’t quite figure out if it is mean to say ‘decoding’? Denis could you correct it?

Regards

Tim






> On 19 Jun 2020, at 15:34, Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I agree - thanks a lot for your work, Denis!
> 
> It helps to get a good summary and present it a bit better.
> 
> Andreas
> 
> On 2020-06-19 16:24, Anita Graser wrote:
> 
>> Thank you Denis!
>> 
>> I think this is an excellent overview of the proposals.
>> 
>> My goal is to send the call for voting out tomorrow evening if there are no arguments against it.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Anita
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 19.06.2020 13:48, Denis Rouzaud wrote:
>>> Hi Anita,
>>>  
>>> Here is a first draft of a one page summary of the grants to be voted on.
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aiolvIpEGhBZ-iLhZl7cbUP1gPQx1-W83ecijpzNi4o/edit?usp=sharing <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aiolvIpEGhBZ-iLhZl7cbUP1gPQx1-W83ecijpzNi4o/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>  
>>> It's quite tricky to report the discussion without looking too negative. I hope this is neutral enough. I am totally open to suggestions, obviously.
>>>  
>>> Let me know what you think,
>>> Denis
>>> 
>>> Le lun. 15 juin 2020 à 19:50, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at <mailto:anitagraser at gmx.at>> a écrit :
>>> Thank you Denis!
>>> 
>>> We need the summaries as soon as possible. According to our timeline, we wanted to publish the voting results at the end of June (after a two week voting period):
>>> 
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CNmSJxztrHrqLfillDH8v1zWaMzxFUyYSPT3sut55eQ/edit?usp=sharing <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CNmSJxztrHrqLfillDH8v1zWaMzxFUyYSPT3sut55eQ/edit?usp=sharing>
>>> If you can manage to write the summaries by Sunday 21st, we can start the voting and have the results ready around July 6th.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Anita
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 19:14 Denis Rouzaud, <denis.rouzaud at gmail.com <mailto:denis.rouzaud at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> Hi, 
>>>>  
>>>> I can give a hand for this. I can compile the summaries and comments.
>>>> When is it due?
>>>>  
>>>> Denis
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 19:04 Anita Graser, <anitagraser at gmx.at <mailto:anitagraser at gmx.at>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Do we have any volunteer for compiling the proposal and discussion
>>>> summaries?
>>>> 
>>>> If nobody is available to take care of this step - we have to decide if
>>>> we feel comfortable to go ahead with the voting without the summaries.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Anita
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 13.06.2020 21:06, Anita Graser wrote:
>>>> > Hi,
>>>> >
>>>> > Since the QEP discussion period is over now, we need to take the next
>>>> > steps:
>>>> >
>>>> > According to our new process (discussed in
>>>> > https://github.com/qgis/PSC/issues/31 <https://github.com/qgis/PSC/issues/31>), proposal and discussion
>>>> > summaries should be prepared that can be sent out to voters.
>>>> >
>>>> > @Paolo are you still available to take care of this?
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> >
>>>> > Anita
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

 




---

Tim Sutton
tim at qgis.org




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200619/e09be4e0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: qgis-icon-60x60.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4401 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200619/e09be4e0/attachment-0001.png>