[Qgis-psc] Grants 2020 preparation for voting

[Even Rouault]

> Anita are you going to provide some background about acceptance criteria or
> back story with the message you send out - especially we should clarify why
> the settings registry and table manager items are in the list if the remit
> is not to fund new features. That last sentence sounds negative but isn’t
> intended that way - I am actually glad to have those features funded if
> they are, just that we should be clear about the rules.

Perhaps they should be acknowledged more as developer oriented features / clean 
house / refactoring tasks, than user-oriented features.

> 
> Lastly, Evan’s proposal has a word ‘deocing’ - I can’t quite figure out if
> it is mean to say ‘decoding’? Denis could you correct it?

Yes, should be 'decoding'

-- 
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200619/38533765/attachment.html>