[Qgis-psc] SAP HANA

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi,

We haven't been approached regarding sustaining member yet. Of course, we
would

But good to hear that they (wanted to) support the contributor meeting in
's-Hertogenbosch.

Greetings,
Andreas

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 15:36, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I see the SAP HANA provider being submitted as a pull request. In
>
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/151#issuecomment-530924946
> ,
> it was rightly suggested they consider becoming a QGIS sustaining member.
> Did they follow up on this "advice" ?
> I don't see them mentioned in
> https://www.qgis.org/en/site/about/sustaining_members.html
> Given SAP size, they would pretty much qualify for a Flagship level which
> isn't used yet :-)
>
> The motivation given in https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/34988 clearly
> shows
> that SAP HANA support in QGIS is mostly a convenience for SAP customers
> (and customers=money,
> so the QGIS project getting a tiny part of that money seems appropriate):
> "SAP's customer base is in quite some demand for HANA support in QGIS.
> Most of those
> customers are already using QGIS, mostly with PostGIS, Oracle and/or
> MSSQL. They expect
> that they can work with HANA in QGIS in the same way they work with these
> databases."
>
> Even
>
> --
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
> http://www.spatialys.com
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc



-- 

--
Andreas Neumann
QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200311/53c5c5b8/attachment.html>