[Qgis-psc] AGM - processing the voting results

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi Ismail,

Yes, it's a good idea to have such an independent committee for next time.

Yes - we definitely will discuss the process in our PSC meeting 
tomorrow. But as Tim said - it is a learning process. Every year 
something slightly new comes up. But hopefully, after some 
repetitions/years we would have fewer and fewer such issues as we 
increasingly learn how to improve the process.

Thank you for your input and suggestion!

Andreas

Am 04.05.20 um 12:16 schrieb Ismail Sunni:
> Hi Andreas and PSC,
>
> Perhaps it's a good idea to create an ad-hoc 
> (neutral/non-PSC-candidate) committee for the next PSC election. I 
> think it's quite common to have this ad-hoc committee in other 
> organization's elections. But of course, it will need 
> time/volunteer/resource to create one.
>
> /me back to code again
>
> Best regards
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 11:46 AM Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net 
> <mailto:a.neumann at carto.net>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I wonder who will be in charge with doing the processing of the
>     voting
>     results:
>
>     - make sure that only voting members voted
>
>     - apply our logic/formula for getting the results for PSC.
>
>     Perhaps we need a "neutral"  person here - maybe Tim - would you be
>     available?
>
>     Thanks and greetings,
>
>     Andreas
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
> -- 
> Ismail Sunni
> Software Engineer
> ismailsunni.id <http://ismailsunni.id>
> ismailsunni.wordpress.com <http://ismailsunni.wordpress.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200504/e6ca40c0/attachment.html>