[Qgis-psc] AGM - processing the voting results

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi again,

Ok - now I see where you got the formula from (section 8.1 in the charter).

But I think that formula is totally broken, esp. if you count the chair, 
vice-chair and treasurer as being part of the PSC. Technically, yes, 
they are part of PSC, but I think the text in 8.1 in the charter only 
deals with PSC-only candidates, and thus excluding the board (at least 
this is my interpretation ;-) ). But then the question arises, how votes 
in the board section should really be weighted. Why did we come up with 
this stupid ranking idea?

The other problem: in the voting form we didn't clearly communicate that 
the PSC-only positions are actually ranked.

Hm - things get a bit complicated ...

Andreas


> Again, I agree with you, I just did what the charter says:
>
> "QGIS Voting Members shall be allowed a number of votes equal to the
> number of PSC memberships up for election and shall be asked to rank
> their votes in order of preference. The votes shall be weighted based on
> the number of PSC positions being voted for." [2]
>
> Cheers
>
> Marco
>
> [1]
> https://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/charter.html#election-of-board-members
> [2]
> https://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/charter.html#election-of-psc-members
>
>> Andreas
>>
>>
>> Am 04.05.20 um 12:34 schrieb Marco Bernasocchi:
>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>
>>> I already had done all the works you mentions in the second and third
>>> page of the result sheet in the AGM2020 folder
>>>
>>> Since all is calculated automatically from the votes I could prepare it
>>> before the deadline.
>>>
>>> It would be great/mandatory to have more eyes going over it.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Marco
>>>
>>> On 04.05.20 11:46, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I wonder who will be in charge with doing the processing of the voting
>>>> results:
>>>>
>>>> - make sure that only voting members voted
>>>>
>>>> - apply our logic/formula for getting the results for PSC.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps we need a "neutral"  person here - maybe Tim - would you be
>>>> available?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and greetings,
>>>>
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc