[Qgis-psc] AGM - processing the voting results

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi Marco,

I am just questioning the formula.

In 2019 we didn't have PSC elections, in 2018 we used the unweighted 
results - see 
https://www.qgis.org/en/_downloads/QGIS-AGM2018-Minutes.pdf (items 7 and 8).

Greetings,

Andreas


Am 04.05.20 um 14:24 schrieb Marco Bernasocchi:
> Hi Andreas
>
> On 04.05.20 13:25, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>> Hi Marco,
>>
>> Thanks for doing this processing.
>>
>> However, the weighted PSC votes formula is something we need to
>> revisit I think. It systematically favors person who run for chair or
>> vice-chair.
>> Is this really the formula we agreed on last time?
> I agree with you, I just did what our charter says ([1]). Since last
> time I was not in the PSC, I can't say what you discussed back then. I
> think Anita and Tim crunched the numbers then.
>> And why does the ranking within the PSC really matter? I added a new
>> column with the actual votes and the results are quite different.
> Again, I agree with you, I just did what the charter says:
>
> "QGIS Voting Members shall be allowed a number of votes equal to the
> number of PSC memberships up for election and shall be asked to rank
> their votes in order of preference. The votes shall be weighted based on
> the number of PSC positions being voted for." [2]
>
> Cheers
>
> Marco
>
> [1]
> https://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/charter.html#election-of-board-members
> [2]
> https://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/charter.html#election-of-psc-members
>
>> Andreas
>>
>>
>> Am 04.05.20 um 12:34 schrieb Marco Bernasocchi:
>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>
>>> I already had done all the works you mentions in the second and third
>>> page of the result sheet in the AGM2020 folder
>>>
>>> Since all is calculated automatically from the votes I could prepare it
>>> before the deadline.
>>>
>>> It would be great/mandatory to have more eyes going over it.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Marco
>>>
>>> On 04.05.20 11:46, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I wonder who will be in charge with doing the processing of the voting
>>>> results:
>>>>
>>>> - make sure that only voting members voted
>>>>
>>>> - apply our logic/formula for getting the results for PSC.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps we need a "neutral"  person here - maybe Tim - would you be
>>>> available?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and greetings,
>>>>
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc