[Qgis-psc] Nomination of Vincent Cloarec (vcloarec) for commit rights

Saber Razmjooei saber.razmjooei at lutraconsulting.co.uk
Thu May 14 02:40:07 PDT 2020


Hi Marco,

>> Maybe we should fix a rule where the PSC has not much to say in this and
to successfully become a new core committer a contributor needs to be
vouched for by at least 5 (?) independent (not coworkers) core
committers....

With QGIS codebase getting more and more diverse and complex how does that
work in practice? For example in Vincent's case, he has been primarily
working on 3D and mesh in QGIS. Those who are probably most qualified to
comment on his skills are his co-workers (Peter and Martin).

Regards
Saber



On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 10:21, Marco Bernasocchi <marco at qgis.org> wrote:

> Hi Peter,
>
> sorry this went under the radar.
>
> I added him to the triage team, while a decision is taken for core
> committer.
>
> A very important point to me is that each time there is a new nomination
> for a core developer, I'm feel, that it is not clear how such decision
> should be taken by us in the PSC.
>
> I don't want to cast my vote lightly, so I usually go and inform myself,
> talk to other core committers, look ad communication in the PRs, mailing
> lists and so on, but I still feel that my opinion is not the best to judge
> such a decision.
> I'd like to have a clear and transparent way to have this yes or no be
> taken. Not all of us follow the details of the code developments, and even
> less of us are in the position to adequately evaluate code quality. I think
> we should be fair in this decision and it might be that the PSC is not the
> correct group of people to evaluate technical capabilities of committers.
>
> Maybe we should fix a rule where the PSC has not much to say in this and
> to successfully become a new core committer a contributor needs to be
> vouched for by at least 5 (?) independent (not coworkers) core committers
> and no major concerns are risen? The PSC would then just acknowledges what
> the core developer community decided and if all is good, awards the
> core-committer status to the nominee.
>
> I want to be very welcoming and encourage new committers to aspire to
> become core committer, but I'd still like the core committer "title" to be
> given out only when the developer community thinks it is really deserved.
>
> I'd like to get some feedback so we can discuss this in the next PSC
> meeting.
>
> Cheers Marco
> On 14.05.20 10:01, Peter Petrik wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am wondering how was this motion settled? I tried to assign Vincent the
> issue in the QGIS issue tracker and I am unable to do so. Would it be
> possible to give him at least some rights to the qgis repository so we can
> assign tickets to him and he can add some labels to his PRs?
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Peter
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 5:29 PM Saber Razmjooei <
> saber.razmjooei at lutraconsulting.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Nyall for nominating Vincent. Indeed, he has done some very nice
>> work on mesh and 3d.
>>
>> @PSC does this need to be voted?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Saber
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 06:35, Peter Petrik <
>> peter.petrik at lutraconsulting.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nyall and PSC,
>>>
>>> I work with Vincent on mesh layer and MDAL tasks closely and he is
>>> indeed a very capable C++ developer and generally very nice person. Having
>>> him on the core team would be great.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 7:17 AM Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1, of course.
>>>> Thanks Nyall for raising this.
>>>> Cheers.
>>>>
>>>> On 18 March 2020 07:14:37 CET, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi PSC,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to formally nominate Vincent Cloarec
>>>>> (https://github.com/vcloarec) for consideration for commit rights to
>>>>> the main QGIS repo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vincent has been doing **fantastic** work in two very specialised (yet
>>>>> increasingly important) parts of QGIS: mesh layer handling and the 3d
>>>>> rendering engine. His work is consistently excellent and upholds all
>>>>> the code quality standards and coding guidelines set in place by the
>>>>> project. We can only benefit from having him as a core member of the
>>>>> QGIS coding team!
>>>>>
>>>>> Nyall
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Qgis-psc mailing listQgis-psc at lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Please excuse my brevity.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Saber Razmjooei
>> www.lutraconsulting.co.uk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing listQgis-psc at lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
> --
> Marco Bernasocchi
>
> QGIS.org Chairhttp://berna.io
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc



-- 
Saber Razmjooei
www.lutraconsulting.co.uk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200514/1711aea6/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list