[Qgis-psc] Nomination of Vincent Cloarec (vcloarec) for commit rights

Marco Bernasocchi marco at qgis.org
Thu May 14 02:57:50 PDT 2020


Hi Saber thanks for the quick feedback

On 14.05.20 11:40, Saber Razmjooei wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> >> Maybe we should fix a rule where the PSC has not much to say in
> this and to successfully become a new core committer a contributor
> needs to be vouched for by at least 5 (?) independent (not coworkers)
> core committers....
>
> With QGIS codebase getting more and more diverse and complex how does
> that work in practice? For example in Vincent's case, he has been
> primarily working on 3D and mesh in QGIS. Those who are probably most
> qualified to comment on his skills are his co-workers (Peter and Martin).

Fair enough, I think that the very fact that Nyall was the proponent for
Vincent shows that it would be possible, 5 is a gut number, it might be
3, 5, 5 with at least 3 non coworkers, X.
The main point to me is that we have great core devs that are very
involved with the project and are definitely better suited than some of
us in the PSC to take such a technical decision. It is not like we have
a new core dev candidate every week, so they know each other and it
would not be a big amount of work for them.

My point on mentioning the coworkers is that I would not want to have
Matthias, Denis and David being the only ones to vouch for a new
OPENGIS.ch employee.

Cheers

marco

>
> Regards
> Saber
>
>
>
> On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 10:21, Marco Bernasocchi <marco at qgis.org
> <mailto:marco at qgis.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Peter,
>
>     sorry this went under the radar.
>
>     I added him to the triage team, while a decision is taken for core
>     committer.
>
>     A very important point to me is that each time there is a new
>     nomination for a core developer, I'm feel, that it is not clear
>     how such decision should be taken by us in the PSC.
>
>     I don't want to cast my vote lightly, so I usually go and inform
>     myself, talk to other core committers, look ad communication in
>     the PRs, mailing lists and so on, but I still feel that my opinion
>     is not the best to judge such a decision.
>     I'd like to have a clear and transparent way to have this yes or
>     no be taken. Not all of us follow the details of the code
>     developments, and even less of us are in the position to
>     adequately evaluate code quality. I think we should be fair in
>     this decision and it might be that the PSC is not the correct
>     group of people to evaluate technical capabilities of committers.
>
>     Maybe we should fix a rule where the PSC has not much to say in
>     this and to successfully become a new core committer a contributor
>     needs to be vouched for by at least 5 (?) independent (not
>     coworkers) core committers and no major concerns are risen? The
>     PSC would then just acknowledges what the core developer community
>     decided and if all is good, awards the core-committer status to
>     the nominee.
>
>     I want to be very welcoming and encourage new committers to aspire
>     to become core committer, but I'd still like the core committer
>     "title" to be given out only when the developer community thinks
>     it is really deserved.
>
>     I'd like to get some feedback so we can discuss this in the next
>     PSC meeting.
>
>     Cheers Marco
>
>     On 14.05.20 10:01, Peter Petrik wrote:
>>     Hi all, 
>>
>>     I am wondering how was this motion settled? I tried to assign
>>     Vincent the issue in the QGIS issue tracker and I am unable to do
>>     so. Would it be possible to give him at least some rights to the
>>     qgis repository so we can assign tickets to him and he can add
>>     some labels to his PRs?
>>
>>     Thanks a lot!
>>     Peter
>>
>>     On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 5:29 PM Saber Razmjooei
>>     <saber.razmjooei at lutraconsulting.co.uk
>>     <mailto:saber.razmjooei at lutraconsulting.co.uk>> wrote:
>>
>>         Thanks Nyall for nominating Vincent. Indeed, he has done some
>>         very nice work on mesh and 3d.
>>
>>         @PSC does this need to be voted?
>>
>>         Kind regards
>>         Saber
>>
>>         On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 06:35, Peter Petrik
>>         <peter.petrik at lutraconsulting.co.uk
>>         <mailto:peter.petrik at lutraconsulting.co.uk>> wrote:
>>
>>             Hi Nyall and PSC,
>>
>>             I work with Vincent on mesh layer and MDAL tasks closely
>>             and he is indeed a very capable C++ developer and
>>             generally very nice person. Having him on the core team
>>             would be great.
>>
>>             Peter 
>>
>>             On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 7:17 AM Paolo Cavallini
>>             <cavallini at faunalia.it <mailto:cavallini at faunalia.it>> wrote:
>>
>>                 +1, of course.
>>                 Thanks Nyall for raising this.
>>                 Cheers.
>>
>>                 On 18 March 2020 07:14:37 CET, Nyall Dawson
>>                 <nyall.dawson at gmail.com
>>                 <mailto:nyall.dawson at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                     Hi PSC,
>>
>>                     I'd like to formally nominate Vincent Cloarec
>>                     (https://github.com/vcloarec) for consideration for commit rights to
>>                     the main QGIS repo.
>>
>>                     Vincent has been doing **fantastic** work in two very specialised (yet
>>                     increasingly important) parts of QGIS: mesh layer handling and the 3d
>>                     rendering engine. His work is consistently excellent and upholds all
>>                     the code quality standards and coding guidelines set in place by the
>>                     project. We can only benefit from having him as a core member of the
>>                     QGIS coding team!
>>
>>                     Nyall
>>                     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>                     Qgis-psc mailing list
>>                     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>                     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>>
>>                 -- 
>>                 Please excuse my brevity.
>>                 _______________________________________________
>>                 Qgis-psc mailing list
>>                 Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>                 <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>                 https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             Qgis-psc mailing list
>>             Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>             https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>>
>>
>>         -- 
>>         Saber Razmjooei
>>         www.lutraconsulting.co.uk <http://www.lutraconsulting.co.uk>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Qgis-psc mailing list
>>         Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>         https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>     -- 
>     Marco Bernasocchi
>
>     QGIS.org Chair
>     http://berna.io
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
> -- 
> Saber Razmjooei
> www.lutraconsulting.co.uk <http://www.lutraconsulting.co.uk>
>
-- 
Marco Bernasocchi

QGIS.org Chair
http://berna.io

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200514/e11b50fd/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list