[Qgis-psc] Grant voting 2021 closed

[Anita Graser]

Thank you Tim and Etienne!

After summing up the 8 top ranked proposals, the total is €22,500. The
next proposal would exceed the planned programme budget of €25,000.

Our options are to 1. fund the top8, 2. top up the budget to fund the
top9, 3. pick a cheaper proposal (like the macOS notarization) that
still fits into the budget.

What do you think? I've put this topic on the PSC meeting agenda but
maybe we can resolve it earlier, here on the list.

Regards,

Anita


On 24.04.2021 04:24, Etienne Trimaille wrote:
> Thanks Anita for the report.
>
> I agree with Tim.
> Just looking at the history of
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/34018
> <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/34018> and all tickets linked to
> this one, it would be nice to improve the situation there.
> I guess a lot of people don't know this trick on MacOS and don't
> report it on GitHub as well.
>
> Regards
>
> Le sam. 24 avr. 2021 à 07:03, Tim Sutton <tim at kartoza.com
> <mailto:tim at kartoza.com>> a écrit :
>
>     Thanks for putting this together Anita!
>
>     I haven'treviewedany formulas, probably a better job for Marco and
>     Andreas, but looking at the results, I would like to say that in
>     my mind QEP#218 Notarizing QGIS for macOS is not really something
>     that should need a grant to be funded. Not having notarisation is
>     like having a web site in 2021 without SSL - we just should not be
>     doing that. Can I propose that we look into funding this
>     regardless of grant funding availability?
>
>     Regards
>
>     Tim
>
>
>     On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 6:30 PM Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at
>     <mailto:anitagraser at gmx.at>> wrote:
>
>         Dear PSC members,
>
>         Voting has closed now. You can find the voting responses here:
>
>         https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1khDRDElKTnB6e_p_ptUz4-4735RCOa7UZfh3hEsQrjI/edit?usp=sharing
>         <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1khDRDElKTnB6e_p_ptUz4-4735RCOa7UZfh3hEsQrjI/edit?usp=sharing>
>
>         I received one change request via email that is reflected in
>         the second
>         sheet.
>
>         I've also spotted one issue of two votes cast by the same
>         country user
>         group representative. I've fixed that in the second sheet as well.
>
>         The third sheet follows the process as outlined in our grant
>         programme
>         process document:
>
>         The calculation of votes is done by summing up the votes. We
>         will then
>         calculate the total number of points that each proposal scores
>         and rank
>         them accordingly.
>
>         Grants will be approved by working sequentially from top scoring
>         proposal to lowest until all the funds have been allocated. If
>         the top
>         candidates do not exactly coincide with the total grant
>         budget, we may,
>         depending on available funds, ‘top up’ the grant budget to
>         include the
>         next-in-line proposal and use up all of the available funds.
>
>         The computed results should be reviewed and confirmed by at
>         least two
>         PSC members before publishing the results.
>
>         So please have a look and review my results.
>
>         Regards,
>
>         Anita
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Qgis-psc mailing list
>         Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>         https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>         <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>
>
>
>     --
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     ​
>
>     Tim Sutton
>     Visit http://kartoza.com <http://kartoza.com/> to find out about
>     open source:
>      * Desktop GIS programming services
>      * Geospatial web development
>     * GIS Training
>     * Consulting Services
>     Tim is a member of the QGIS Project Steering Committee
>     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     _______________________________________________
>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20210424/8e570211/attachment.html>