[Qgis-psc] Grant voting 2021 closed

[Etienne Trimaille]

Thanks Anita for the report.

I agree with Tim.
Just looking at the history of https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/34018
and all tickets linked to this one, it would be nice to improve the
situation there.
I guess a lot of people don't know this trick on MacOS and don't report it
on GitHub as well.

Regards

Le sam. 24 avr. 2021 à 07:03, Tim Sutton <tim at kartoza.com> a écrit :

> Thanks for putting this together Anita!
>
> I haven't reviewed any formulas, probably a better job for Marco and
> Andreas, but looking at the results, I would like to say that in my mind QEP#218
> Notarizing QGIS for macOS is not really something that should need a grant
> to be funded. Not having notarisation is like having a web site in 2021
> without SSL - we just should not be doing that. Can I propose that we look
> into funding this regardless of grant funding availability?
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 6:30 PM Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:
>
>> Dear PSC members,
>>
>> Voting has closed now. You can find the voting responses here:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1khDRDElKTnB6e_p_ptUz4-4735RCOa7UZfh3hEsQrjI/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> I received one change request via email that is reflected in the second
>> sheet.
>>
>> I've also spotted one issue of two votes cast by the same country user
>> group representative. I've fixed that in the second sheet as well.
>>
>> The third sheet follows the process as outlined in our grant programme
>> process document:
>>
>> The calculation of votes is done by summing up the votes. We will then
>> calculate the total number of points that each proposal scores and rank
>> them accordingly.
>>
>> Grants will be approved by working sequentially from top scoring
>> proposal to lowest until all the funds have been allocated. If the top
>> candidates do not exactly coincide with the total grant budget, we may,
>> depending on available funds, ‘top up’ the grant budget to include the
>> next-in-line proposal and use up all of the available funds.
>>
>> The computed results should be reviewed and confirmed by at least two
>> PSC members before publishing the results.
>>
>> So please have a look and review my results.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Anita
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ​
>
> Tim Sutton
> Visit http://kartoza.com to find out about open source:
>  * Desktop GIS programming services
>  * Geospatial web development
> * GIS Training
> * Consulting Services
> Tim is a member of the QGIS Project Steering Committee
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20210424/2d96cfe9/attachment.html>