[Qgis-psc] Handling the Travis CI situation

[Matthias Kuhn]

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:37 PM Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 08:28, Marco Bernasocchi <marco at qgis.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all, no need to vote again, the budget was approved and it included an
>> item for working on CI.
>>
>> So the funds are available. I spoke about this yesterday with Andreas
>> following up a request by Denis.
>>
>> Nyall do I see it correctly that you and Denis (and Alessandro?) are
>> probably the ones going to be doing most of the work?
>>
>> Do you have a concrete plan and how can we help getting things moving?
>>
>
> I'll chat to Denis and Alessandro again later today, but originally we'd
> discussed using Denis' earlier PR to move to Gtihub actions and have Denis
> do the remaining bits needed for this, and then splitting the test fixes
> between myself, Denis and Alessandro based on the area of code covered by
> the failing tests. (I.e. I'll handle the symbology/labeling/print layout
> and projection related ones, Alessandro would focus on server, etc).
>
> I'd propose that we:
> 1. Get Denis' earlier PR rebased and working on master again
> 2. Blocklist all the failing tests on the github action, and then merge
> the PR so that we get some test coverage outside of Travis
> 3. Chip away re-enabling the individual blocklisted tests one-by-one
>
> Nyall
>
>
Good plan, it would be nice to start with this soon

Matthias
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20210129/a7ae8512/attachment.html>