[Qgis-psc] Handling the Travis CI situation

[Alessandro Pasotti]

Sounds good!

How do we solve the Docker Hub problem? I abandoned the idea to ask
for a free tier after Nyall's comment.

Can we put the exported image on one of our qgis* servers?



On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 8:41 AM Matthias Kuhn <matthias at opengis.ch> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:37 PM Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 08:28, Marco Bernasocchi <marco at qgis.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all, no need to vote again, the budget was approved and it included an item for working on CI.
>>>
>>> So the funds are available. I spoke about this yesterday with Andreas following up a request by Denis.
>>>
>>> Nyall do I see it correctly that you and Denis (and Alessandro?) are probably the ones going to be doing most of the work?
>>>
>>> Do you have a concrete plan and how can we help getting things moving?
>>
>>
>> I'll chat to Denis and Alessandro again later today, but originally we'd discussed using Denis' earlier PR to move to Gtihub actions and have Denis do the remaining bits needed for this, and then splitting the test fixes between myself, Denis and Alessandro based on the area of code covered by the failing tests. (I.e. I'll handle the symbology/labeling/print layout and projection related ones, Alessandro would focus on server, etc).
>>
>> I'd propose that we:
>> 1. Get Denis' earlier PR rebased and working on master again
>> 2. Blocklist all the failing tests on the github action, and then merge the PR so that we get some test coverage outside of Travis
>> 3. Chip away re-enabling the individual blocklisted tests one-by-one
>>
>> Nyall
>>
>
> Good plan, it would be nice to start with this soon
>
> Matthias
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc



-- 
Alessandro Pasotti
QCooperative:  www.qcooperative.net
ItOpen:   www.itopen.it