[Qgis-psc] Handling the Travis CI situation

[Matthias Kuhn]

Should we first try to use the github docker registry?
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/guides/publishing-docker-images#publishing-images-to-github-packages

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:13 AM Marco Bernasocchi <marco at qgis.org> wrote:

> perfect thanks.
>
> let us know if you need anything else.
>
> re the docker image i think we could potentially set up a registry?
>
> cheers
>
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021, 08:59 Alessandro Pasotti, <apasotti at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sounds good!
>>
>> How do we solve the Docker Hub problem? I abandoned the idea to ask
>> for a free tier after Nyall's comment.
>>
>> Can we put the exported image on one of our qgis* servers?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 8:41 AM Matthias Kuhn <matthias at opengis.ch>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:37 PM Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 08:28, Marco Bernasocchi <marco at qgis.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi all, no need to vote again, the budget was approved and it
>> included an item for working on CI.
>> >>>
>> >>> So the funds are available. I spoke about this yesterday with Andreas
>> following up a request by Denis.
>> >>>
>> >>> Nyall do I see it correctly that you and Denis (and Alessandro?) are
>> probably the ones going to be doing most of the work?
>> >>>
>> >>> Do you have a concrete plan and how can we help getting things moving?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I'll chat to Denis and Alessandro again later today, but originally
>> we'd discussed using Denis' earlier PR to move to Gtihub actions and have
>> Denis do the remaining bits needed for this, and then splitting the test
>> fixes between myself, Denis and Alessandro based on the area of code
>> covered by the failing tests. (I.e. I'll handle the
>> symbology/labeling/print layout and projection related ones, Alessandro
>> would focus on server, etc).
>> >>
>> >> I'd propose that we:
>> >> 1. Get Denis' earlier PR rebased and working on master again
>> >> 2. Blocklist all the failing tests on the github action, and then
>> merge the PR so that we get some test coverage outside of Travis
>> >> 3. Chip away re-enabling the individual blocklisted tests one-by-one
>> >>
>> >> Nyall
>> >>
>> >
>> > Good plan, it would be nice to start with this soon
>> >
>> > Matthias
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Qgis-psc mailing list
>> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alessandro Pasotti
>> QCooperative:  www.qcooperative.net
>> ItOpen:   www.itopen.it
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20210129/9f764bc4/attachment-0001.html>