[Qgis-psc] Discussing LTR Update frequency
Harrissou s.
delazj at gmail.com
Sun Nov 21 06:20:13 PST 2021
Hi,
Assuming the monthly releases until February, and the release-when-critical suggestions are validated, can we go with a 4 months point release instead of 3 months? Let's align with current schedule that people are used to. I think it would be easier for everyone to expect/explain that LTR point releases are out when regular releases are than trying to guess when the LTR next point release is. Communicate a single date.
Regards,
Harrissou
Le 21 novembre 2021 12:42:01 GMT+01:00, Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net> a écrit :
>Right,
>
>If we treat the new LTR release like a "regular" release in the
>beginning, with monthly updates, my concerns are void. Also, if we can
>release extra versions in case of a severe issues, like Nyall suggested.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Andreas
>
>On 2021-11-20 21:14, Denis Rouzaud wrote:
>
>> Isn't there a misunderstanding when the release actually becomes LTR?
>>
>> I would have thought that there is 1 release per month for the first 3
>> months, and then, when it turns LTR and from this time only every 3
>> months?
>>
>> Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 09:55, Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Dear PSC colleagues and core devs,
>>>
>>> We have discussed to reduce the update frequency of the LTR release at
>>> the last meeting. I think everybody sort of agreed to reduce the nr of
>>> releases in the light of starting manual testing prior to release.
>>>
>>> Marco announced that on a mail to the QGIS users mailing list:
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/2021-November/050232.html
>>>
>>> BUT: i don't remember that we came to a final decision/conclusion on
>>> how often to really release. I have doubts that the fixed quarterly
>>> releases are a good idea, because of the following:
>>>
>>> - in the first few months of the lifetime of an LTR there are
>>> typically way more issues discovered than later. I think that the
>>> beginning of an LTR we need a denser release schedule than just
>>> quarterly
>>>
>>> - we have a quarantine rule that backports that go into the regular
>>> release can only go into the LTR release after one month of quarantine
>>> in the regular release. This can further delay important backports in
>>> the light of only releasing LTR updates quarterly.
>>>
>>> I would like to discuss whether we could have some schedule that
>>> starts a bit denser at the beginning and then thins out later in the
>>> lifetime of an LTR.
>>>
>>> E.g. something like:
>>>
>>> LTR-Release:and releases 1, 2, 4,6,9,12 months after the release.
>>>
>>> I know this is a bit more complicated to handle, but I believe it
>>> ŵould be more useful for the users.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Andreas _______________________________________________
>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20211121/3b87a9db/attachment.html>
More information about the Qgis-psc
mailing list