[Qgis-psc] Finalizing the budget

[Ismail Sunni]

Hi Andreas and PSC,

Thanks for managing this budgeting stuff.

I saw in the spreadsheet, that there are some significant increases (e.g.
2x for contributor meetings) or some new expenses (e.g. sponsoring OSMF). I
am not against the budget at all, for me it's understandable. But will
there be any more detailed remarks when we do the voting? Just in case
someone asks so that I can give the official answer (and not based on my
own opinion).

Thanks :)

Best regards

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 7:46 PM Andreas Neumann via QGIS-PSC <
qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Thank  you both Ale and Régis for your feedback.
>
> As suggested from Ale, I moved 10k € from the Qt6 migration to the code
> reviewing.
>
> We can still try to come up with more formal ways and/or ideas on how to
> distribute the 30k € among the active core contributors who want and can
> contribute to the code reviewing.
>
> Régis already has formulated some thoughts on the reviewing. We can
> discuss this at the next PSC meeting.
>
> Marco: can you please put up the budget proposal for voting among the
> voting members - so that we can have an accepted budget when starting into
> 2024? Thank you!
>
> Greetings,
> Andreas
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 09:00, Alessandro Pasotti <apasotti at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> I think my proposal probably came at the wrong time, there is no need to
>> rush  a decision.
>>
>> We can discuss it thoroughly next year.
>>
>> But, if we wanted to implement it for 2024, I think that we should
>> allocate a budget for at least 4 hours/week.
>>
>> We could probably reduce (half?) the budget for QT6 migration because I
>> expect that most of the work will be completed with the 2023 budget.
>>
>> I would really like to hear what other core devs think about this
>> proposal though, I only spoke with a few of them.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>
>> Il mar 12 dic 2023, 17:48 Andreas Neumann via QGIS-PSC <
>> qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> ha scritto:
>>
>>> Dear PSC colleagues,
>>>
>>> I'd like to finalize the 2024 budget:
>>>
>>> The one major issue that needs discussion is the proposal from Ale to
>>> have fixed developers with fixed hours to do code and PR reviewing. What
>>> do the other PSC members think about this proposal?
>>>
>>> What is the required budget for this? Currently, we have 20k reserved
>>> for this. Is this enough? If not, how much would we need?
>>>
>>> If we would need more than 20k in the budget - what other budget items
>>> could we reduce to get a balanced out budget?
>>>
>>> See
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19JlXyiY8KH8gvrERVDGjcA_HWE49GwL42F__HdJnT7I/edit?usp=sharing
>>> for the current budget proposal.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your replies,
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andreas Neumann
>>> QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> QGIS-PSC mailing list
>>> QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> --
> Andreas Neumann
> QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-PSC mailing list
> QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>


-- 
Ismail Sunni
Software Engineer
ismailsunni.id
ismailsunni.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20231214/240d08c9/attachment-0001.htm>