[Qgis-psc] Qt6 status

[Andreas Neumann]

HI Nyall,

Thank you for the status update and your work!

Question: do you still prefer the skipping of one release and then release
of QGIS 4.0 in February 2026? Just to be clear on this.

Thank you for your reply,
Andreas

On Wed, 3 Sept 2025 at 00:30, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-PSC <
qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 at 11:47, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 at 19:35, Mathieu Pellerin via QGIS-PSC
> > <qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > With regards to the timeline question raised by Marco in this thread,
> I'd like to add a +1 to the idea of postponing QGIS 4.0. At the very least,
> I think we should make a conscious decision about it sooner than later :)
> >
> > I'm also +1 to deferring QGIS 4.0 for one release cycle. (ie skip
> > October's release, and release 4.0 in February).
> >
> > The CI port to Qt 6 is basically ready now (at
> > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/62809). However -- there's still a
> > handful of tests which pass under Qt 5 which are skipped on the Qt 6
> > builds right now, and this makes me nervous. If we merged #62809 today
> > and moved exclusively to Qt 6 then we'll lose some test coverage. I'd
> > prefer to hold off merging #62809 until we can get these remaining
> > tests passing on the ubuntu qt6 builds.
>
>
> Status update: we've now moved ALL of testing CI to Qt 6! 🥳 All tests
> which were passing on qt 5 are now passing on qt 6, and a handful of
> underlying issues which were breaking these remaining tests have been fixed.
>
> Nyall
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-PSC mailing list
> QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>


-- 

--
Andreas Neumann
QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20250903/64615056/attachment.htm>