[Qgis-psc] Qt6 status

[Nathan Woodrow]

I agree with Nyalls position on this.  No point rushing it out esp
considering the API changes and plugins etc and more testing time.

On Wed, 3 Sept 2025, 5:24 pm Nyall Dawson via QGIS-PSC, <
qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, 3 Sept 2025, 5:03 pm Andreas Neumann, <andreas at qgis.org> wrote:
>
>> HI Nyall,
>>
>> Thank you for the status update and your work!
>>
>> Question: do you still prefer the skipping of one release and then
>> release of QGIS 4.0 in February 2026? Just to be clear on this
>>
>
> IMO, yes -- we should skip.
>
> Nyall
>
>
>> Thank you for your reply,
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Wed, 3 Sept 2025 at 00:30, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-PSC <
>> qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 at 11:47, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 at 19:35, Mathieu Pellerin via QGIS-PSC
>>> > <qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > With regards to the timeline question raised by Marco in this
>>> thread, I'd like to add a +1 to the idea of postponing QGIS 4.0. At the
>>> very least, I think we should make a conscious decision about it sooner
>>> than later :)
>>> >
>>> > I'm also +1 to deferring QGIS 4.0 for one release cycle. (ie skip
>>> > October's release, and release 4.0 in February).
>>> >
>>> > The CI port to Qt 6 is basically ready now (at
>>> > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/62809). However -- there's still a
>>> > handful of tests which pass under Qt 5 which are skipped on the Qt 6
>>> > builds right now, and this makes me nervous. If we merged #62809 today
>>> > and moved exclusively to Qt 6 then we'll lose some test coverage. I'd
>>> > prefer to hold off merging #62809 until we can get these remaining
>>> > tests passing on the ubuntu qt6 builds.
>>>
>>>
>>> Status update: we've now moved ALL of testing CI to Qt 6! 🥳 All tests
>>> which were passing on qt 5 are now passing on qt 6, and a handful of
>>> underlying issues which were breaking these remaining tests have been fixed.
>>>
>>> Nyall
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> QGIS-PSC mailing list
>>> QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>> Andreas Neumann
>> QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
>>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-PSC mailing list
> QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20250903/d0c6a7e3/attachment.htm>