AW: [Qgis-user] Qgis on eeepc 901: 2nd round

[Agustin Lobo]

Thanks,
I've selected qgis, python-qgis and qgis-plugin-grass,
should I select any of the libqgis*0.11 files that
have not been automatically selected?
As this is a tiny machine, I rather keep it siple
(I'm actually not sure of keeping the grass plugin)

Agus

Hugentobler Marco wrote:
> Hi Agustin,
> 
> The packages are compiled with compiler opimisation turned on. So I don't expect speed improvements with self-compiled binaries. In terms of storage efficiency, it may be an advantage that by compiling yourself you can only include what you need (e.g. grass, postgis, gsl, expat, georeferencer, gpx, wfs are optional).
> 
> Regards,
> Marco 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: qgis-user-bounces at lists.osgeo.org im Auftrag von Agustin Lobo
> Gesendet: Fr 19.09.2008 10:48
> An: qgis-user
> Betreff: [Qgis-user] Qgis on eeepc 901: 2nd round
>  
> Hi!
> 
> After solving few problems related to the OS
> (Xandros vs ubuntu-eeee) thanks to the kind help of many people,
> I'm now about trying to install QGIS
> on the eeepc 901 running ubuntu-eee
> instead of its original Xandros
> (I'll tell why in a future and more
> comprehensive message).
> 
> Before starting (this afternoon), one question:
> In terms of efficiency of the resulting QGIS,
> is it better that I compile myself on the
> eee-pc or would I get similar performance
> by installing the ubuntu binaries?
> 
> In other words, does it pay in terms
> of efficiency the (for me considerable) complexity
> of compiling myself? Note that this is a tiny
> machine, thus any improvement could be important
> in the long term, so I'm kind of resigned myself to
> the involved task of compiling if you think
> that I ought to.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Agus
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Dr. Agustin Lobo
Institut de Ciencies de la Terra "Jaume Almera" (CSIC)
LLuis Sole Sabaris s/n
08028 Barcelona
Spain
Tel. 34 934095410
Fax. 34 934110012
email: Agustin.Lobo at ija.csic.es
http://www.ija.csic.es/gt/obster