[Qgis-user] Public Repository for plugins...

[Sampson, David]

 Well, I assume that the two plugins I posted will remain in the wild as they are designed from a tester's point of view and from an educational point of view.

I would say that plugins that are general enough to benifit ,majority of QGIS users make it to the core. For the other SPECIALIZED plugins a group to review them might be a good idea.

I imagine that most of this would depend on the community, for prolific authors might hold more weight than the one times and the learners.

A process that merely checks off criteria versus worthiness might make a lot of sense.  Making the process objective instead of subjective.

Just some thoughts.

Cheers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: qgis-user-bounces at lists.osgeo.org 
> [mailto:qgis-user-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Alex Mandel
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 22:07
> To: Borys Jurgiel
> Cc: qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] Public Repository for plugins...
> 
> Borys Jurgiel wrote:
> > Monday 08 of June 2009 22:42:34 Dane Springmeyer napisał(a):
> > 
> >> Funny - how is it that there are only two 'official plugins'?
> > 
> > Yes - nobody is keen to form a High Committee and evaluate 
> plugins... 
> > :(
> 
> I don't think too many people have asked, besides that it 
> seems that plugins that are really good end up in the core 
> code most of the time and don't exist as separate plugins for long.
> 
> Alex
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>